中美局势要变天？莫迪通知全球，对美打响第一枪，30多国齐上阵

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. tariff policy has reached an unprecedented level of deadlock, with the Supreme Court ruling against the legality of tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and additional tariffs related to fentanyl, marking a significant blow to Trump's tariff strategy [1] Group 1: Legal and Political Developments - The Supreme Court's ruling is seen as a critical intervention that undermines the legal basis of Trump's tariff policies, potentially affecting their implementation and legitimacy [1][5] - Following the ruling, Trump quickly signed a new executive order to impose a 10% additional tax on all imports, which was rapidly increased to 15%, indicating a strategic anxiety within the administration [3][5] Group 2: International Reactions - The ruling has triggered a strong response from various countries, with India clarifying its stance on oil purchases from Russia and halting a planned high-level trade delegation to the U.S., reflecting a shift in diplomatic relations [7][10] - Over thirty countries, including the EU, Brazil, Canada, and Australia, have expressed serious concerns about the U.S. tariff actions, indicating a collective unease without forming a formal coalition [11] Group 3: Implications for Trade Relations - The legal uncertainty surrounding U.S. tariffs has led to a deterioration of trust among traditional allies, with countries now more cautious in their trade dealings with the U.S. [11][15] - The situation has created a landscape where the U.S. is perceived as a source of global policy uncertainty, prompting other nations to seek more stable and predictable trade partners [15]