连续3次喊话中国后，特朗普撒下弥天大谎，把3亿多美国人当猴耍

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implications of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on Trump's trade policies, highlighting the administration's frantic attempts to communicate with China amidst a loss of leverage due to the invalidation of tariffs [1][3][5]. Group 1: Supreme Court Ruling and Immediate Reactions - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 against the Trump administration's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, rendering it ineffective [3]. - Following the ruling, senior trade representative Greer was dispatched to send signals to China, urging them not to exploit the situation and to adhere to previous trade agreements [3][5]. Group 2: Economic Context and Domestic Pressures - The article notes that the U.S. economy is facing significant challenges, with the GDP growth rate for Q4 2025 at only 1.4%, a sharp decline from 4.4% in Q3 [6][7]. - Despite claims of economic prosperity, public sentiment regarding Trump's handling of the economy, inflation, and tariffs is low, with approval ratings below 40% [9][10]. Group 3: Strategic Avoidance of China in Public Discourse - During the State of the Union address, Trump notably avoided mentioning China, despite discussing other international issues, indicating a strategic decision to prevent potential backlash from a trade dispute [10][12]. - The avoidance of direct confrontation with China is seen as a tactic to maintain a facade of control and to prepare for an upcoming visit to China, aiming to create a more favorable diplomatic atmosphere [14][15].