Group 1 - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the Trump administration's tariff policy based on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act was unconstitutional, rendering it ineffective and putting the administration in a vulnerable position [1][5] - Following the ruling, the Trump administration attempted to stabilize the situation by urging China to adhere to previous trade agreements and avoid retaliatory measures, while Trump delivered a lengthy State of the Union address claiming economic prosperity [3][5] - The Supreme Court's decision emphasized that the imposition of tariffs is a power exclusive to Congress, not the President, which could significantly impact U.S.-China trade relations and the upcoming midterm elections [5][12] Group 2 - China has maintained a rational and restrained response to U.S. pressures, indicating it is assessing the implications of the Supreme Court ruling and will adjust its tariff measures accordingly [7][12] - Trump's State of the Union address included several misleading claims about the economy, such as asserting that inflation had completely dissipated and that the U.S. was experiencing unprecedented prosperity, despite official data showing a decline in GDP growth and persistent high prices for essential goods [9][14] - The Trump administration has shifted from overt confrontation to more covert strategies aimed at strategically containing China, including increasing global tariffs and reallocating military resources to the Indo-Pacific region [13][14]
特朗普3次喊话中国,当众召开吹牛大会!要把美国人当猴耍?
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2026-02-27 03:48