硬抗3天后，特朗普接受现实，全球关税大战结束，中国一句话回应

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Customs has officially stopped imposing global tariffs, marking the collapse of Trump's tariff system, as ruled by the Supreme Court with a 6-3 decision, leading to the potential refund of $175 billion in tariffs collected [1][3][10]. Group 1: Legal and Political Implications - The Supreme Court's ruling deemed Trump's tariff system illegal, which was established under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), leading to a significant reduction in presidential power regarding tariffs [5][10]. - Following the ruling, Trump expressed his anger during a press conference, labeling the decision as a "national disgrace," but was ultimately forced to comply with the legal judgment [8][10]. - The ruling necessitates the refund of approximately $175 billion collected in tariffs, which poses a significant financial burden on U.S. Customs and could lead to extensive legal battles with companies seeking refunds [10][12]. Group 2: Economic Consequences - Trump's reliance on tariffs was primarily aimed at addressing the U.S. federal debt, which has surpassed $38 trillion, with projected net interest payments exceeding $1.2 trillion in the 2025 fiscal year [15]. - The imposition of tariffs has led to rising domestic prices, negatively impacting American consumers, with around 60% of Americans opposing the tariff policies [17][31]. - The adjustment of tariffs to a maximum of 15% under the Trade Act of 1974 limits Trump's previous authority, indicating a significant shift in trade policy and its implications for U.S. allies [12][14]. Group 3: International Reactions and Trade Dynamics - Allies such as the UK and Australia, who initially accepted Trump's tariffs, are now at a disadvantage as the new policy reduces tariffs to 15% for all countries, undermining their previous concessions [19][21]. - The European Parliament has paused the approval process for the U.S.-EU trade agreement, reflecting widespread discontent among U.S. allies regarding Trump's unpredictable trade policies [25]. - China's response has been measured, indicating a comprehensive assessment of the situation, while maintaining its position as the largest buyer of U.S. agricultural products, which could influence future negotiations [27][29].