影石创新重要公告，事关“美国337调查”

Core Viewpoint - The final ruling of the US 337 investigation concluded in favor of the company, with the US International Trade Commission (ITC) determining that all six patent infringement claims made by GoPro were unfounded [1][4]. Group 1: Investigation Outcome - The ITC upheld the initial ruling, stating that five of the six patent claims by GoPro were either not infringed or the related patents were invalid [4]. - For the remaining design patent, the company's new design was confirmed by the ITC as not infringing [4]. Group 2: Impact on the Company - The investigation did not have a substantial impact on the company's production or operations, allowing it to continue importing and selling existing products in the US without restrictions [3]. - Despite the legal challenges, the company reported a significant revenue increase of 76.85% year-on-year, achieving a total revenue of 9.858 billion yuan, marking a historical high [4][5]. Group 3: Financial Performance - The company's net profit attributable to the parent company was 964 million yuan, reflecting a year-on-year decline of 3.08%, while the non-recurring net profit decreased by 6.74% to 882 million yuan [4]. - The company invested 1.649 billion yuan in research and development during the reporting period, focusing on long-term growth and new product launches [5]. Group 4: Market Dynamics - The investigation highlighted a competitive strategy by GoPro, which was seen as an aggressive market maneuver rather than a standard patent enforcement action [4]. - The company emphasized its strong market performance compared to GoPro, attributing part of its success to the advantages of the Chinese supply chain [4].