得意洋洋的印度人，准备对特朗普蹬鼻子上脸，美国大棒却还在后面

Group 1 - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Trump cannot use national emergency powers to bypass Congress for large-scale tariff measures, potentially requiring the return of over $100 billion in tariffs already collected [1] - In response to the ruling, India is considering renegotiating its recently signed trade agreement with the U.S., viewing this as an opportunity to avoid punitive tariffs and restore oil trade with Russia [1] - The legal framework in the U.S. allows for significant presidential discretion in trade matters, with various laws providing the president with broad powers to impose tariffs without congressional approval [3][5][7] Group 2 - The 1974 Trade Act's Section 122 allows the president to impose temporary tariffs without congressional approval, which can effectively become permanent through repeated renewals [5] - Section 301 of the same act enables the U.S. government to investigate and retaliate against foreign trade practices deemed harmful to U.S. interests, while Section 232 allows for tariffs based on national security concerns [7][8] - The recent Supreme Court ruling clarifies that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act should be used by Congress rather than the president, indicating a lack of domestic support for Trump's tariff policies [8]