What did jury decide in social media case against Meta and Google?

Core Viewpoint - A Los Angeles jury found Meta and Google liable in a landmark case regarding the impact of their social media platforms on children's mental health, specifically focusing on addiction and its consequences [1]. Group 1: Jury Verdict - The jury awarded $3 million in damages to the plaintiff, with Meta responsible for 70% and Google for 30% of the total amount [3]. - The jury determined that both companies were negligent in their design and operation of their respective platforms, Instagram and YouTube [4][7]. Group 2: Impact on Plaintiff - Meta's negligence was identified as a "substantial factor" in harming the plaintiff, who reported that her use of Instagram exacerbated her mental health issues [5]. - Similarly, Google's negligence was also deemed a "substantial factor" in the plaintiff's harm, with her stating that YouTube's features contributed to her depression and anxiety [8]. Group 3: User Warnings - The jury found that Meta failed to adequately warn users about the dangers associated with using Instagram [6]. - Google was also found liable for not providing sufficient warnings regarding the risks of using YouTube [10].