基于登记的贫困和社会排斥测量（英）2024

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the industry under review. Core Insights - The report emphasizes the importance of developing a robust methodology for assessing poverty and social exclusion in Croatia, leveraging the forthcoming Central Register of the Population to fill data gaps and improve monitoring [19][23][26]. Overview of Key Concepts and Data Sources in the EU - The report outlines the official definitions of poverty and social exclusion indicators required by Eurostat, highlighting the shift from survey-based to administrative data for tracking these issues [29][30]. - It defines key concepts such as household disposable income and at-risk-of-poverty (AROP), with AROP being set at 60% of the national median equivalized disposable income after social transfers [31][34]. - The report discusses social exclusion as a multidimensional issue, emphasizing the need to evaluate deprivation across various aspects of life, not just income [35][36]. Croatia's Central Register of the Population - The report details the development of Croatia's Central Register of the Population, which aims to enhance data collection and analysis for poverty and social exclusion metrics [26][28]. - It highlights the importance of administrative data sources in measuring poverty and social exclusion, noting the challenges and potential solutions for utilizing these data effectively [10][26]. Register-Based Poverty Measurements in Croatia - The report examines existing measures of at-risk-of-poverty in Croatia, identifying challenges such as incomplete tax income data and under-reporting of income [10][35]. - Recommendations for improving poverty measurement methodologies in Croatia are provided, focusing on data imputation and addressing under-reporting issues [10][50]. Register-Based Measurements of Social Exclusion in Croatia - The report discusses the existing approaches to measuring social exclusion in Croatia and offers recommendations for simplifying the AROPE rate and developing domain-specific indicators [5][59]. - It emphasizes the need for a comprehensive monitoring system to track social exclusion indicators at subnational levels [7][79]. Institutional Set-Up for Tracking Poverty and Social Exclusion - The report suggests potential institutional arrangements for data collection and analysis, including joint implementations by various ministries and agencies [6][71]. - It outlines the activities and requirements necessary for effective monitoring of poverty and social exclusion indicators [6][71]. Next Steps - The report concludes with a roadmap for the next steps in developing the monitoring system for poverty and social exclusion, emphasizing the importance of stakeholder engagement and data integration [8][91].