斯里兰卡：技术援助报告债务管理改革计划（英）2024

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the industry Core Insights - The fragmented public debt management legal framework and functions have led to incoherent management of public debt in Sri Lanka, necessitating the establishment of a consolidated Debt Management Office (DMO) and improved debt transparency as a government priority [18][20][24] - The mission recommends a new Public Debt Management (PDM) law to define the DMO's mandate, governance, and accountability framework, which should include annual reporting to Parliament on debt management strategy progress [20][21][66] - The DMO should be located within the Ministry of Finance (MoF) to align with practices in emerging markets, with a focus on developing a Medium-Term Debt Management Strategy (MTDS) and an Annual Borrowing Plan (ABP) [21][22][25] - Recommendations include strengthening the legal framework for loan guarantees and on-lending arrangements to mitigate fiscal risks, and establishing a coordinating committee for better oversight [27][28] Summary by Sections I. Introduction - The objective of the Debt Management Reform Plan is to assist Sri Lankan authorities in improving debt management and transparency, with commitments under the IMF-supported program and World Bank's Development Policy Operation [32][33] II. Macroeconomic Background - Sri Lanka's public debt reached 128% of GDP at the end of 2022, driven by a large fiscal deficit and economic contraction, with gross borrowing needs at 34.6% of GDP [43][44] - The economic outlook remains challenging, with projected contraction in 2023 and gradual recovery expected by 2026 [43] III. Legal Framework - The current legal framework for public debt management is fragmented, lacking a unified law that clearly defines public debt and the roles of various stakeholders [77][80] - The report emphasizes the need for a coherent legal framework to establish guiding principles for public debt management and clarify governance and accountability [59][62] IV. Institutional Framework - The establishment of the DMO within the MoF is recommended, consolidating various debt management functions while ensuring operational independence through an approved MTDS [21][22][25] - The report suggests structuring the DMO along functional lines to enhance efficiency and accountability [27] V. Debt Transparency - The report highlights the need for improved debt data management and unified reporting to enhance transparency and accountability in public debt management [24][66] - Recommendations include developing a new debt recording system and ensuring all debt-related data is included [28] VI. Management Framework for Government Guarantees and On-Lending - The report calls for a legal and operational framework for managing government guarantees and on-lending to mitigate fiscal risks [28][29] - It emphasizes the importance of establishing quantitative risk limits and introducing guarantee fees as risk mitigation instruments [29]