中国人身险产品变迁历史与未来展望系列报告（二）

Investment Rating - The report maintains an "Accumulate" rating for the insurance industry [1] Core Insights - The evolution of life insurance products in the UK, US, and Japan highlights a shift towards health and annuity insurance, driven by demographic changes and economic factors [2][5][33] - The US life insurance market has seen a significant increase in market share, with life insurance premium income rising from $542.9 billion in 2000 to $685.9 billion in 2023, reflecting a compound growth rate of 1.0% [14][20] - In Japan, the life insurance market is transitioning towards health insurance, with a notable increase in the demand for medical and cancer insurance products due to an aging population [36][39] Summary by Sections 1. US Life Insurance Market - The US life insurance market's share of global premiums increased from 18.7% in 2010 to 23.9% in 2022, with a stable share above 20% since 2019 [11] - Life insurance density in the US rose from $1,504 per person in 2010 to $2,017 in 2022, while the depth decreased from 3.1% to 2.6% during the same period [11][13] - Annuity insurance has become the primary source of premium income, accounting for over 50% of the market, while health insurance is experiencing rapid growth [19][21] 2. Japanese Life Insurance Market - Japan's life insurance density and depth have declined from $3,445 per person and 7.5% in 2010 to $1,942 and 5.9% in 2022, respectively [33] - The demand for health insurance products has surged, with medical and cancer insurance policies growing significantly due to an aging population [36][39] - The evolution of life insurance products in Japan is influenced by economic conditions, demographic changes, and regulatory policies [39][48] 3. UK Life Insurance Market - The UK life insurance market has a rich history of product innovation, with a current focus on annuity products due to increasing life expectancy and regulatory changes [2][3] - The market remains stable, with a diverse range of products, primarily driven by economic development, population aging, and tax incentives [2][3][5]