关于公共采购的见解：BREADY项目的主要发现（英）2025

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the public procurement industry Core Insights - The report highlights significant variations in public procurement practices across 50 economies, emphasizing the importance of regulatory frameworks and digital procurement in fostering competition and efficiency [1][2][3] - It identifies that good practices in public procurement can be adopted regardless of an economy's income level, with notable examples from both high-income and low-income economies [18][19] - The average Composite Procurement Category score across the 50 economies is 51.1 points, indicating a broad presence of procurement rules but also shared challenges in improving procurement systems [18][19] Summary by Sections Regulatory Framework - The Regulatory Framework pillar has a mean score of 51 points, indicating that while many economies have adopted good regulatory practices, there is still a struggle to design targeted policies to attract new suppliers [22][23] - Greece and North Macedonia lead in this pillar, showcasing that even lower-income economies can strengthen their regulatory frameworks [22][23] Public Services - The Public Services pillar shows the largest score dispersion, with a min-max range of 90 points, primarily due to uneven adoption of digital procurement processes [35][36] - Approximately 70% of economies have implemented a centralized e-procurement portal, but the sophistication of these systems varies significantly [36][37] Operational Efficiency - The Operational Efficiency pillar has the highest average score at 60.4 points, reflecting that governments have focused on streamlining internal processes rather than enhancing public-facing services [38][39] - Georgia ranks highest in this pillar with a score of 96 points, demonstrating effective operational practices across various income levels [39][40]