Workflow
评估伯利兹数据驱动决策的统计需求:伯利兹统计研究所统计需求评估摘要(英)
Shi Jie Yin Hang·2025-06-03 06:25

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the industry under review Core Insights - The Statistical Institute of Belize (SIB) has made significant progress in developing its statistical infrastructure, with an overall Statistical Performance Indicator (SPI) score of 65.1 in 2023, up from 47.7 in 2016, indicating a 36.58% improvement [12][13] - Key priorities for SIB include developing the National Strategy for the Development of Statistics (NSDS), integrating administrative data, and addressing resource constraints to enhance its capacity as a data producer and coordinator [10][31] Summary by Sections National Context - Belize's NSS is evaluated using the World Bank's SPI, which assesses data use, services, products, sources, and infrastructure, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 [11] - Belize's SPI score of 65.1 indicates substantial progress, nearing the average of other countries in the LAC region but still below upper middle-income countries [12] Findings - The SIB's self-assessment revealed a moderate performance across most components of the Global SNA, with a score of 2.85 out of 4 [21] - The strongest area identified was human resources, while data collection and openness were the weakest [21] Data Producers - SIB produces 50% of relevant statistical data, excelling in censuses and surveys but lacking in administrative data integration [22][24] - Recent innovations in poverty statistics have improved data collection frequency [25] Coordinators - SIB has the authority to coordinate the NSS but lacks a standardized mechanism for data collection across agencies [27] - The NSDS is being developed to address coordination gaps [27] Promoters of Data Use - SIB publishes statistics on various sectors, including poverty and health, but lacks comprehensive analysis on business activities and national accounts [28] Capacity - SIB demonstrates strong capacity in human resources and data dissemination, but there is room for improvement in public data access [29][30] Priorities - Key priorities include finalizing the NSDS, integrating administrative data, and ensuring personnel and infrastructure needs are met [31] Conclusion and Action Plan - To enhance its role, SIB must build on existing structures and implement strategic actions derived from the assessment [32] Priority Actions for Improvement - Develop and validate the NSDS, leverage technology for data generation, and onboard additional human resources to improve data collection coordination [33][34]