金融期权策略早报-20250619
Wu Kuang Qi Huo·2025-06-19 03:26
- Report Industry Investment Rating - No relevant content provided 2. Core Views of the Report - The Shanghai Composite Index and large-cap blue-chip stocks are consolidating and fluctuating at high levels, while small and medium-cap stocks and ChiNext stocks are showing signs of oscillating recovery [2]. - The implied volatility of financial options is fluctuating at a relatively low historical level [2]. - For ETF options, it is suitable to construct covered call strategies, neutral double-selling strategies, and vertical spread combination strategies; for index options, it is suitable to construct neutral double-selling strategies and arbitrage strategies between synthetic long or short options and long or short futures [2]. 3. Summary Based on Related Catalogs 3.1 Financial Market Important Index Overview - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3,388.81, up 1.40 points or 0.04%, with a trading volume of 441 billion yuan, a decrease of 17 billion yuan [3]. - The Shenzhen Component Index closed at 10,175.59, up 24.16 points or 0.24%, with a trading volume of 750.1 billion yuan, an increase of 9 billion yuan [3]. - The SSE 50 Index closed at 2,679.92, down 4.03 points or -0.15%, with a trading volume of 62.1 billion yuan, a decrease of 14 billion yuan [3]. - The CSI 300 Index closed at 3,874.97, up 4.59 points or 0.12%, with a trading volume of 230.6 billion yuan, an increase of 10.2 billion yuan [3]. - The CSI 500 Index closed at 5,745.87, down 5.04 points or -0.09%, with a trading volume of 154.5 billion yuan, a decrease of 56 billion yuan [3]. - The CSI 1000 Index closed at 6,135.39, down 6.08 points or -0.10%, with a trading volume of 256.5 billion yuan, a decrease of 44 billion yuan [3]. 3.2 Option Underlying ETF Market Overview - The SSE 50 ETF closed at 2.750, down 0.003 or -0.11%, with a trading volume of 4.2768 million lots, an increase of 4.2196 million lots, and a trading volume of 1.176 billion yuan, a decrease of 395 million yuan [4]. - The SSE 300 ETF closed at 3.904, up 0.003 or 0.08%, with a trading volume of 4.808 million lots, an increase of 4.7597 million lots, and a trading volume of 1.874 billion yuan, a decrease of 51 million yuan [4]. - The SSE 500 ETF closed at 5.776, down 0.009 or -0.16%, with a trading volume of 1.5013 million lots, an increase of 1.479 million lots, and a trading volume of 866 million yuan, a decrease of 427 million yuan [4]. - The Huaxia Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF closed at 1.018, up 0.006 or 0.59%, with a trading volume of 21.4129 million lots, an increase of 21.1578 million lots, and a trading volume of 2.175 billion yuan, a decrease of 411 million yuan [4]. - The E Fund Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF closed at 0.992, up 0.004 or 0.40%, with a trading volume of 425,150 lots, an increase of 419,150 lots, and a trading volume of 421 million yuan, a decrease of 173 million yuan [4]. - The Shenzhen 300 ETF closed at 4.030, up 0.006 or 0.15%, with a trading volume of 598,600 lots, an increase of 593,900 lots, and a trading volume of 241 million yuan, an increase of 53 million yuan [4]. - The Shenzhen 500 ETF closed at 2.311, down 0.001 or -0.04%, with a trading volume of 471,400 lots, an increase of 457,000 lots, and a trading volume of 109 million yuan, a decrease of 223 million yuan [4]. - The Shenzhen 100 ETF closed at 2.674, up 0.010 or 0.38%, with a trading volume of 222,100 lots, an increase of 219,600 lots, and a trading volume of 59 million yuan, a decrease of 6 million yuan [4]. - The ChiNext ETF closed at 2.034, up 0.006 or 0.30%, with a trading volume of 4.9311 million lots, an increase of 4.8886 million lots, and a trading volume of 1 billion yuan, an increase of 136 million yuan [4]. 3.3 Option Factor - Volume and Position PCR - For the SSE 50 ETF option, the trading volume was 890,100 contracts, an increase of 105,400 contracts; the open interest was 1.4762 million contracts, a decrease of 1,600 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 0.91, a decrease of 0.21; the open interest PCR was 0.90, a decrease of 0.01 [5]. - For the SSE 300 ETF option, the trading volume was 1.0424 million contracts, an increase of 368,800 contracts; the open interest was 1.214 million contracts, a decrease of 6,000 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 0.95, an increase of 0.08; the open interest PCR was 0.86, an increase of 0.01 [5]. - For the SSE 500 ETF option, the trading volume was 1.7361 million contracts, an increase of 469,900 contracts; the open interest was 1.3216 million contracts, an increase of 15,200 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 0.87, a decrease of 0.06; the open interest PCR was 1.05, a decrease of 0.06 [5]. - For the Huaxia Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF option, the trading volume was 562,300 contracts, an increase of 108,500 contracts; the open interest was 1.6534 million contracts, a decrease of 2,200 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 1.03, an increase of 0.35; the open interest PCR was 0.67, an increase of 0.01 [5]. - For the E Fund Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF option, the trading volume was 129,500 contracts, a decrease of 49,000 contracts; the open interest was 497,200 contracts, a decrease of 6,500 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 0.83, a decrease of 0.14; the open interest PCR was 0.70, an increase of 0.01 [5]. - For the Shenzhen 300 ETF option, the trading volume was 91,800 contracts, an increase of 4,700 contracts; the open interest was 244,100 contracts, an increase of 9,400 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 1.09, a decrease of 0.82; the open interest PCR was 1.02, an increase of 0.03 [5]. - For the Shenzhen 500 ETF option, the trading volume was 120,700 contracts, an increase of 38,500 contracts; the open interest was 327,500 contracts, an increase of 4,300 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 1.20, a decrease of 0.03; the open interest PCR was 1.06, unchanged [5]. - For the Shenzhen 100 ETF option, the trading volume was 56,000 contracts, an increase of 12,800 contracts; the open interest was 123,200 contracts, an increase of 1,700 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 1.14, a decrease of 0.02; the open interest PCR was 0.99, an increase of 0.03 [5]. - For the ChiNext ETF option, the trading volume was 818,800 contracts, an increase of 60,800 contracts; the open interest was 1.416 million contracts, a decrease of 2,200 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 1.01, a decrease of 0.01; the open interest PCR was 0.92, an increase of 0.03 [5]. - For the SSE 50 index option, the trading volume was 30,200 contracts, an increase of 7,300 contracts; the open interest was 74,500 contracts, an increase of 200 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 0.53, a decrease of 0.02; the open interest PCR was 0.60, an increase of 0.01 [5]. - For the CSI 300 index option, the trading volume was 76,800 contracts, an increase of 14,600 contracts; the open interest was 196,800 contracts, a decrease of 100 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 0.65, a decrease of 0.01; the open interest PCR was 0.69, an increase of 0.03 [5]. - For the CSI 1000 index option, the trading volume was 212,700 contracts, an increase of 23,000 contracts; the open interest was 289,700 contracts, an increase of 2,000 contracts; the trading volume PCR was 1.00, an increase of 0.07; the open interest PCR was 0.95, a decrease of 0.01 [5]. 3.4 Option Factor - Pressure and Support Levels - For the SSE 50 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 2.750, the at-the-money strike price was 2.75, the pressure level was 2.80, the support level was 2.75, the maximum call open interest was 115,632 contracts, and the maximum put open interest was 84,480 contracts [7]. - For the SSE 300 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 3.904, the at-the-money strike price was 3.90, the pressure level was 3.91, the support level was 3.81, the maximum call open interest was 94,197 contracts, and the maximum put open interest was 71,517 contracts [7]. - For the SSE 500 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 5.776, the at-the-money strike price was 5.75, the pressure level was 5.75, the support level was 5.50, the maximum call open interest was 111,552 contracts, and the maximum put open interest was 95,770 contracts [7]. - For the Huaxia Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 1.018, the at-the-money strike price was 1.00, the pressure level was 1.05, the support level was 1.00, the maximum call open interest was 165,118 contracts, and the maximum put open interest was 99,204 contracts [7]. - For the E Fund Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 0.992, the at-the-money strike price was 1.00, the pressure level was 1.05, the support level was 0.95, the maximum call open interest was 52,455 contracts, and the maximum put open interest was 27,069 contracts [7]. - For the Shenzhen 300 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 4.030, the at-the-money strike price was 4.00, the pressure level was 4.10, the support level was 4.00, the maximum call open interest was 15,998 contracts, and the maximum put open interest was 17,450 contracts [7]. - For the Shenzhen 500 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 2.311, the at-the-money strike price was 2.30, the pressure level was 2.30, the support level was 2.25, the maximum call open interest was 13,303 contracts, and the maximum put open interest was 19,503 contracts [7]. - For the Shenzhen 100 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 2.674, the at-the-money strike price was 2.65, the pressure level was 2.70, the support level was 2.65, the maximum call open interest was 10,793 contracts, and the maximum put open interest was 7,531 contracts [7]. - For the ChiNext ETF option, the underlying closing price was 2.034, the at-the-money strike price was 2.05, the pressure level was 2.05, the support level was 2.00, the maximum call open interest was 88,352 contracts, and the maximum put open interest was 108,969 contracts [7]. - For the SSE 50 index option, the underlying closing price was 2,679.92, the at-the-money strike price was 2,700, the pressure level was 2,700, the support level was 2,500, the maximum call open interest was 2,263 contracts, and the maximum put open interest was 985 contracts [7]. - For the CSI 300 index option, the underlying closing price was 3,874.97, the at-the-money strike price was 3,850, the pressure level was 3,900, the support level was 3,850, the maximum call open interest was 4,261 contracts, and the maximum put open interest was 2,796 contracts [7]. - For the CSI 1000 index option, the underlying closing price was 6,135.39, the at-the-money strike price was 6,100, the pressure level was 6,100, the support level was 5,800, the maximum call open interest was 4,426 contracts, and the maximum put open interest was 3,624 contracts [7]. 3.5 Option Factor - Implied Volatility - For the SSE 50 ETF option, the at-the-money implied volatility was 12.36%, the weighted implied volatility was 13.07%, an increase of 0.53%; the annual average was 9.09%; the call implied volatility was 13.12%, the put implied volatility was 13.01%; the 20-day historical volatility was 12.65%, and the difference between implied and historical volatility was 0.42% [9]. - For the SSE 300 ETF option, the at-the-money implied volatility was 12.69%, the weighted implied volatility was 14.10%, an increase of 0.66%; the annual average was 9.52%; the call implied volatility was 13.98%, the put implied volatility was 14.24%; the 20-day historical volatility was 13.20%, and the difference between implied and historical volatility was 0.90% [9]. - For the SSE 500 ETF option, the at-the-money implied volatility was 15.05%, the weighted implied volatility was 17.00%, an increase of 1.72%; the annual average was 12.02%; the call implied volatility was 17.01%, the put implied volatility was 16.98%; the 20-day historical volatility was 16.13%, and the difference between implied and historical volatility was 0.86% [9]. - For the Huaxia Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF option, the at-the-money implied volatility was 19.75%, the weighted implied volatility was 24.12%, an increase of 0.18%; the annual