多因子选股周报：估值因子表现出色，四大指增组合年内超额均超8%-20250705

• The report tracks the performance of Guosen JinGong's index enhancement portfolios and public fund index enhancement products, alongside monitoring the performance of common stock selection factors across different stock selection spaces [12][13][16] - Guosen JinGong's index enhancement portfolios are constructed based on three main components: return prediction, risk control, and portfolio optimization. These portfolios are benchmarked against indices such as CSI 300, CSI 500, CSI 1000, and CSI A500 [13][15] - The MFE (Maximized Factor Exposure) portfolio is used to test the effectiveness of individual factors under real-world constraints. The optimization model maximizes single-factor exposure while controlling for style, industry, stock weight deviations, and other constraints. The formula for the optimization model is: $\begin{array}{ll}max&f^{T}\ w\ s.t.&s_{l}\leq X(w-w_{b})\leq s_{h}\ &h_{l}\leq H(w-w_{b})\leq h_{h}\ &w_{l}\leq w-w_{b}\leq w_{h}\ &b_{l}\leq B_{b}w\leq b_{h}\ &\mathbf{0}\leq w\leq l\ &\mathbf{1}^{T}\ w=1\end{array}$ where f represents factor values, w is the stock weight vector, and constraints include style exposure (X), industry exposure (H), stock weight deviation (w), and component stock weight limits (B_b) [40][41][42] - The factor library includes over 30 factors categorized into valuation, reversal, growth, profitability, liquidity, corporate governance, and analyst dimensions. Examples include BP (Net Asset/Market Cap), single-quarter EP (Net Profit/Market Cap), and EPTTM (TTM Net Profit/Market Cap) [17][18] - Factor performance varies across different stock selection spaces. For CSI 300, factors like single-quarter EP, EPTTM, and expected EPTTM performed well recently, while factors like three-month volatility and expected net profit QoQ performed poorly [19][20] - For CSI 500, factors such as single-quarter ROE, DELTAROE, and single-quarter EP showed strong performance recently, whereas factors like one-year momentum and three-month reversal underperformed [21][22] - In the CSI 1000 space, factors like standardized unexpected earnings, EPTTM, and single-quarter EP performed well, while factors like non-liquidity impact and three-month institutional coverage lagged [23][24] - For CSI A500, factors such as expected EPTTM, single-quarter ROE, and expected PEG showed strong performance, while factors like one-year momentum and expected net profit QoQ underperformed [25][26] - In the public fund heavy index space, factors like expected PEG, expected EPTTM, and single-quarter EP performed well recently, while factors like one-month reversal and one-month volatility performed poorly [27][28] - Public fund index enhancement products are tracked for their excess returns relative to benchmarks. For CSI 300 products, the highest weekly excess return was 1.02%, and the lowest was -0.37%, with a median of 0.08% [29][33] - CSI 500 products showed a weekly excess return range of 1.87% to -0.44%, with a median of 0.38% [34][35] - CSI 1000 products had a weekly excess return range of 1.06% to -0.43%, with a median of 0.38% [36][37] - CSI A500 products showed a weekly excess return range of 0.73% to -0.19%, with a median of 0.17% [38][39]