金融期权策略早报-20250709

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Report's Core View - The Shanghai Composite Index, large-cap blue-chip stocks, small and medium-cap stocks, and ChiNext stocks showed a market trend of high-level oscillation with a slight upward bias [2]. - The implied volatility of financial options fluctuated at a relatively low average level [2]. - For ETF options, it is suitable to construct covered strategies, neutral double-selling strategies, and vertical spread combination strategies; for stock index options, it is suitable to construct neutral double-selling strategies and arbitrage strategies between synthetic long or short options and long or short futures [2]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Financial Market Important Index Overview - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3,497.48, up 24.35 points or 0.70%, with a trading volume of 567.5 billion yuan, an increase of 91.3 billion yuan [3]. - The Shenzhen Component Index closed at 10,588.39, up 152.89 points or 1.47%, with a trading volume of 886.4 billion yuan, an increase of 154 billion yuan [3]. - The SSE 50 Index closed at 2,747.19, up 15.66 points or 0.57%, with a trading volume of 67.9 billion yuan, an increase of 11.2 billion yuan [3]. - The CSI 300 Index closed at 3,998.45, up 33.28 points or 0.84%, with a trading volume of 292.1 billion yuan, an increase of 67 billion yuan [3]. - The CSI 500 Index closed at 5,977.74, up 77.34 points or 1.31%, with a trading volume of 217 billion yuan, an increase of 51.2 billion yuan [3]. - The CSI 1000 Index closed at 6,407.70, up 80.56 points or 1.27%, with a trading volume of 306.8 billion yuan, an increase of 42 billion yuan [3]. 3.2 Option Underlying ETF Market Overview - The SSE 50 ETF closed at 2.845, up 0.017 or 0.60%, with a trading volume of 4.5824 million shares, an increase of 4.5536 million shares, and a trading value of 1.302 billion yuan, an increase of 488 million yuan [4]. - The SSE 300 ETF closed at 4.048, up 0.034 or 0.85%, with a trading volume of 6.1225 million shares, an increase of 6.0823 million shares, and a trading value of 2.474 billion yuan, an increase of 859 million yuan [4]. - The SSE 500 ETF closed at 6.031, up 0.080 or 1.34%, with a trading volume of 1.6749 million shares, an increase of 1.667 million shares, and a trading value of 1.007 billion yuan, an increase of 538 million yuan [4]. - The Huaxia Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF closed at 1.044, up 0.015 or 1.46%, with a trading volume of 27.7694 million shares, an increase of 27.6006 million shares, and a trading value of 2.887 billion yuan, an increase of 1.146 billion yuan [4]. - The E Fund Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF closed at 1.017, up 0.013 or 1.29%, with a trading volume of 5.9245 million shares, an increase of 5.8893 million shares, and a trading value of 600 million yuan, an increase of 246 million yuan [4]. - The Shenzhen 300 ETF closed at 4.176, up 0.033 or 0.80%, with a trading volume of 1.0039 million shares, an increase of 997,900 shares, and a trading value of 419 million yuan, an increase of 169 million yuan [4]. - The Shenzhen 500 ETF closed at 2.411, up 0.032 or 1.35%, with a trading volume of 408,800 shares, an increase of 400,300 shares, and a trading value of 98 million yuan, a decrease of 104 million yuan [4]. - The Shenzhen 100 ETF closed at 2.776, up 0.038 or 1.39%, with a trading volume of 282,300 shares, an increase of 276,000 shares, and a trading value of 78 million yuan, a decrease of 95 million yuan [4]. - The ChiNext ETF closed at 2.159, up 0.049 or 2.32%, with a trading volume of 12.5912 million shares, an increase of 12.5149 million shares, and a trading value of 2.7 billion yuan, an increase of 1.087 billion yuan [4]. 3.3 Option Factor - Volume and Open Interest PCR - For the SSE 50 ETF option, the trading volume was 1.1057 million contracts, an increase of 421,900 contracts; the open interest was 1.3304 million contracts, a decrease of 14,600 contracts; the volume PCR was 0.74, a decrease of 0.28; the open interest PCR was 1.05, an increase of 0.01 [5]. - For the SSE 300 ETF option, the trading volume was 1.2542 million contracts, an increase of 533,300 contracts; the open interest was 1.2606 million contracts, a decrease of 61,900 contracts; the volume PCR was 0.62, a decrease of 0.18; the open interest PCR was 0.90, an increase of 0.03 [5]. - For the SSE 500 ETF option, the trading volume was 1.677 million contracts, an increase of 853,900 contracts; the open interest was 1.2289 million contracts, a decrease of 11,000 contracts; the volume PCR was 0.79, a decrease of 0.24; the open interest PCR was 1.17, an increase of 0.11 [5]. - For the Huaxia Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF option, the trading volume was 631,000 contracts, an increase of 347,700 contracts; the open interest was 1.5122 million contracts, a decrease of 2,300 contracts; the volume PCR was 0.52, a decrease of 0.10; the open interest PCR was 0.63, a decrease of 0.00 [5]. - For the E Fund Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF option, the trading volume was 156,700 contracts, an increase of 83,600 contracts; the open interest was 435,500 contracts, an increase of 6,900 contracts; the volume PCR was 0.67, a decrease of 0.04; the open interest PCR was 0.68, an increase of 0.02 [5]. - For the Shenzhen 300 ETF option, the trading volume was 115,200 contracts, an increase of 58,200 contracts; the open interest was 189,800 contracts, an increase of 12,000 contracts; the volume PCR was 0.66, a decrease of 0.21; the open interest PCR was 1.00, a decrease of 0.01 [5]. - For the Shenzhen 500 ETF option, the trading volume was 164,900 contracts, an increase of 97,200 contracts; the open interest was 241,800 contracts, an increase of 18,500 contracts; the volume PCR was 0.91, an increase of 0.08; the open interest PCR was 1.17, an increase of 0.09 [5]. - For the Shenzhen 100 ETF option, the trading volume was 102,300 contracts, an increase of 41,800 contracts; the open interest was 96,700 contracts, a decrease of 600 contracts; the volume PCR was 1.03, a decrease of 0.02; the open interest PCR was 1.14, an increase of 0.00 [5]. - For the ChiNext ETF option, the trading volume was 1.686 million contracts, an increase of 815,200 contracts; the open interest was 1.4025 million contracts, an increase of 69,900 contracts; the volume PCR was 0.64, a decrease of 0.16; the open interest PCR was 0.99, an increase of 0.14 [5]. - For the SSE 50 index option, the trading volume was 34,900 contracts, an increase of 12,400 contracts; the open interest was 68,700 contracts, an increase of 3,300 contracts; the volume PCR was 0.38, a decrease of 0.08; the open interest PCR was 0.57, a decrease of 0.02 [5]. - For the CSI 300 index option, the trading volume was 94,100 contracts, an increase of 37,600 contracts; the open interest was 192,500 contracts, an increase of 5,900 contracts; the volume PCR was 0.45, a decrease of 0.16; the open interest PCR was 0.70, an increase of 0.00 [5]. - For the CSI 1000 index option, the trading volume was 271,100 contracts, an increase of 138,300 contracts; the open interest was 268,400 contracts, an increase of 3,200 contracts; the volume PCR was 0.72, a decrease of 0.19; the open interest PCR was 1.03, an increase of 0.05 [5]. 3.4 Option Factor - Pressure and Support Levels - For the SSE 50 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 2.845, the at-the-money strike price was 2.85, the pressure level was 2.85, the support level was 2.80; the maximum open interest for calls was 85,163 contracts, and for puts was 120,991 contracts [7]. - For the SSE 300 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 4.048, the at-the-money strike price was 4.00, the pressure level was 4.10, the support level was 3.90; the maximum open interest for calls was 97,565 contracts, and for puts was 87,680 contracts [7]. - For the SSE 500 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 6.031, the at-the-money strike price was 6.00, the pressure level was 6.00, the support level was 5.75; the maximum open interest for calls was 102,195 contracts, and for puts was 146,951 contracts [7]. - For the Huaxia Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 1.044, the at-the-money strike price was 1.05, the pressure level was 1.05, the support level was 1.00; the maximum open interest for calls was 155,689 contracts, and for puts was 86,804 contracts [7]. - For the E Fund Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 1.017, the at-the-money strike price was 1.00, the pressure level was 1.05, the support level was 1.00; the maximum open interest for calls was 41,548 contracts, and for puts was 32,942 contracts [7]. - For the Shenzhen 300 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 4.176, the at-the-money strike price was 4.20, the pressure level was 4.30, the support level was 4.00; the maximum open interest for calls was 13,666 contracts, and for puts was 20,205 contracts [7]. - For the Shenzhen 500 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 2.411, the at-the-money strike price was 2.40, the pressure level was 2.40, the support level was 2.30; the maximum open interest for calls was 12,500 contracts, and for puts was 18,205 contracts [7]. - For the Shenzhen 100 ETF option, the underlying closing price was 2.776, the at-the-money strike price was 2.80, the pressure level was 2.75, the support level was 2.45; the maximum open interest for calls was 4,650 contracts, and for puts was 7,180 contracts [7]. - For the ChiNext ETF option, the underlying closing price was 2.159, the at-the-money strike price was 2.15, the pressure level was 2.15, the support level was 2.10; the maximum open interest for calls was 83,541 contracts, and for puts was 99,866 contracts [7]. - For the SSE 50 index option, the underlying closing price was 2,747.19, the at-the-money strike price was 2,750, the pressure level was 2,800, the support level was 2,650; the maximum open interest for calls was 4,437 contracts, and for puts was 3,317 contracts [7]. - For the CSI 300 index option, the underlying closing price was 3,998.45, the at-the-money strike price was 4,000, the pressure level was 4,000, the support level was 3,950; the maximum open interest for calls was 9,260 contracts, and for puts was 10,832 contracts [7]. - For the CSI 1000 index option, the underlying closing price was 6,407.70, the at-the-money strike price was 6,400, the pressure level was 6,400, the support level was 6,000; the maximum open interest for calls was 10,025 contracts, and for puts was 10,188 contracts [7]. 3.5 Option Factor - Implied Volatility - For the SSE 50 ETF option, the at-the-money implied volatility was 12.62%, the weighted implied volatility was 13.76%, an increase of 1.09%; the annual average was 15.88%; the call implied volatility was 14.27%, the put implied volatility was 13.00%; the 20-day historical volatility was 12.26%, and the implied - historical volatility difference was 1.51% [9]. - For the SSE 300 ETF option, the at-the-money implied volatility was 13.00%, the weighted implied volatility was 14.01%, an increase of 1.06%; the annual average was 16.60%; the call implied volatility was 14.36%, the put implied volatility was 13.44%; the 20-day historical volatility was 12.66%, and the implied - historical volatility difference was 1.34% [9]. - For the SSE 500 ETF option, the at-the-money implied volatility was 15.64%, the weighted implied volatility was 16.97%, an increase of 1.36%; the annual average was 21.14%; the call implied volatility was 17.57%, the put implied volatility was 16.18%; the 20-day historical volatility was 15.35%, and the implied - historical volatility difference was 1.61% [9]. - For the Huaxia Science and Technology Innovation 50 ETF option, the at-the-money implied volatility was 20.63%, the weighted implied volatility was 23.24%, an increase of 0