策略深度报告：对比供给侧改革经验，如何看待“反内卷”的市场影响？

Group 1: "Anti-Involution" Framework - The government has shifted its focus from merely preventing "involution" to a comprehensive rectification of "involution-style" competition, emphasizing the need for industry self-discipline and the elimination of local protectionism [5][6][8] - Recent high-level meetings have highlighted the importance of addressing "involution-style" competition, with specific measures aimed at promoting a unified national market and improving regulatory frameworks [5][6][8] Group 2: Supply-Side Reform Review - The previous supply-side reform focused on reducing excess capacity in traditional industries through administrative measures, while the current "anti-involution" approach aims to mitigate low-price competition in emerging industries using market-oriented methods [2][17] - The supply-side reform from 2015 to 2017 resulted in significant capacity reductions, with over 170 million tons of steel and 1 billion tons of coal capacity eliminated, leading to improved profitability in related sectors [18][19] Group 3: Market Outlook - The current "anti-involution" market is still in the expectation catalysis phase, with industries like photovoltaic and steel showing positive performance, while others like lithium batteries and e-commerce are lagging [2][3] - The report suggests that industries with lower capacity utilization and higher profit pressures are more likely to self-correct, indicating a potential for improvement in sectors such as photovoltaic equipment and construction materials [2][3] Group 4: Industry-Specific Measures - The government is promoting industry self-discipline and innovation, with initiatives encouraging companies to enhance product quality and phase out outdated capacities [7][14] - Specific industries, including photovoltaic, steel, and cement, are being targeted for regulatory measures to curb low-price competition and promote sustainable development [7][14][16]