2025Q2基金持仓深度分析：重塑定价权之路

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the report indicates that in Q2 2025, actively managed equity funds showed good performance but have not yet entered a positive "asset-liability" cycle, where good performance attracts new funds to reinforce performance trends [2][3][4] - In Q2 2025, the stock position of actively managed equity funds rose to 85.76%, with A-shares at 71.30% and Hong Kong stocks at 14.45%, continuing the trend of "reducing A and increasing Hong Kong" [2][11] - The median return for actively managed equity funds in Q2 2025 was approximately 1.8%, with over 50% of funds outperforming their benchmarks, although this proportion decreased from 72% in Q1 2025 [2][15][17] Group 2 - In Q2 2025, actively managed equity funds continued to increase their positions in mid-cap and small-cap growth stocks, as well as small-cap value stocks, while reducing positions in food and beverage, automotive, machinery, and home appliances [3][16] - The report highlights that the active funds have shifted from underweight to overweight in the telecommunications sector, while their overweight in food and beverage has dropped to the lowest level since 2017 [3][16] - The performance of actively managed equity funds continues to exhibit a "stronger gets stronger" characteristic, with top-performing funds showing significant exposure to high valuation, low dividend yield, small to mid-cap stocks, high gross margin, and low ROE [2][22][23] Group 3 - The "fixed income plus" funds also increased their allocations to financials, TMT, military, and medical sectors in Q2 2025, mirroring the trends seen in actively managed equity funds [4][29] - Since July 2025, individual investors have re-emerged as the main source of incremental funds, leading to a continued rise in the positions of actively managed equity funds and a return of capital from northbound investments [4][30] - The report notes that the overall net inflow of equity funds (both active and passive) has resumed, but the divergence between active and passive funds has widened, with active funds experiencing net outflows while passive funds saw significant inflows [2][3][4]