中美瑞典经贸会谈点评：缓和期单独延长，关税战日渐微妙

Group 1: Trade Relations and Tariff Policies - The US-China trade talks in Sweden resulted in a 90-day extension of the tariff relief period, contrasting with the EU and Japan's acceptance of new tariffs under US pressure[3] - The US has imposed a 15% tariff on EU imports, while the EU committed to invest $600 billion in the US and purchase $750 billion in US energy products[3] - Japan agreed to a 15% tariff on US goods and pledged to invest $550 billion in the US, highlighting the differences in trade negotiations compared to China[3] Group 2: Economic Implications - The US's universal tariff policy may lead to increased import prices and reduced demand, impacting domestic production costs[4] - The US economy shows resilience with strong retail and labor market data, indicating sustained domestic demand despite tariff pressures[4] - European and Japanese economies, heavily reliant on exports to the US, face risks of being undermined by US tariff policies due to their lack of effective domestic demand stimulation[4] Group 3: China's Strategic Response - China's dual approach to the US tariff war focuses on maintaining the integrity and competitiveness of its supply chain while stimulating domestic consumption and investment[5] - The extension of the tariff relief period may alleviate some downward pressure on China's exports in the second half of the year[5] - Future economic policies in China will prioritize resolving real estate and local debt risks, expanding fiscal stimulus to boost domestic consumption, and encouraging effective investment[5]