略 研 究 华福证券 策略点评报告 2026 年 2 月 26 日 春节后的开门红将如何演绎？ 投资要点： ➢ 事件：截至2月25日收盘，A股实现春节后开门红。相较于春节前最 后一个交易日收盘，上证指数上涨1.6%，中证1000上涨2.7%，沪深300 上涨1.62%，万得全A上涨2.12%，录得全红态势。 ➢ 从历史走势梳理，我们发现，2010年以来，每年春节以后的A股市场 在短期内是相当乐观的，上涨概率非常高。其中，在春节后五个交易日收 盘，上证指数、中证1000、沪深300和万得全A的上涨概率分别达到了 75%、87.5%、68.8%和81.3%；春节后十个交易日收盘，上证指数、中 证1000、沪深300和万得全A的上涨概率分别达到了75%、93.8%、 62.5%和75%。 ➢ 这种春节后的赚钱效应，可能与多种因素有关。例如每年的投资项目 开工、银行贷款资金投放等，往往在年初比较集中。同时，资金在春节后 往往也呈现出流入股市的情况。以场内融资资金为例，在春节前，往往呈 现融资余额减少的情况，而春节后，则呈现融资余额增加的情况。这或许 是春节后几个交易日里市场上涨的直接动因之一。 华福证券 ➢ 从资产配 ...

证券研究报告|行业深度报告 社会服务 行业评级 强于大市（维持评级） 2026年2月25日 2H25国内高端消费显著提升， 富人资产修复背景下有望延续增势 证券分析师： 姚婧 执业证书编号：S0210525060002 李天阳 执业证书编号：S0210525080001 请务必阅读报告末页的重要声明 华福证券 华福证券 投资要点 Ø 高端消费市场整体企稳回暖，大中华区复苏动能强劲。 2 华福证券 华福证券 • 2025年下半年起，主要奢侈品集团在亚太区（剔除日本）的销售增速显著改善，LVMH、历峰等集团增速在连续7个 季度后首次转正。 中国区市场的改善已成为全球奢侈品集团业绩修复的关键变量，各大品牌普遍看好中国市场的长期 潜力。 国内高端商场零售额增速亦在下半年显著提升。 2025年恒隆地产内地商场租户零售额同比增长4%，日均客流 量创历史新高；太古地产旗下多数商场在下半年显著提速，其中上海兴业太古汇凭借标志性项目"路易号"拉动，零 售额大增49.6%。 Ø 财富效应驱动高端消费需求回升，高频指标印证修复。 • 富人资产增速、海南离岛免税数据、澳门博彩业数据、高档酒店数据等可做高端消费高频跟踪；二奢数据反映大 ...

行 华福证券 农林牧渔 2026 年 02 月 24 日 业 研 究 农林牧渔 节后淡季来临，猪价或延续跌势 投资要点： 行 业 定 期 报 告 生猪养殖：节后淡季来临，猪价或延续跌势。（1）节后猪价下探。春 节多数屠企停工放假，生猪购销基本停滞，随假期步入尾声，养殖企业陆 续恢复出栏，市场购销恢复，猪价开启回落，2 月 23 日猪价回落至 11.26 元/公斤，较 2 月 13 日-0.4 元/公斤。（2）消费淡季来临，节后宰量处于低 位水平。随假期步入尾声，多数屠企已陆续开工，当前宰量处于低位水平， 收购顺畅度高，采购难度不大。2 月 23 日样本企业日屠宰量 9.20 万头，较 节前 2 月 13 日下降 64%。冻品方面，春节前屠企加快消化冻品库存。截至 2 月 12 日当周，行业冻品库存率 17.18%，周环比-4.08pct。（3）生猪均重 季节性下降。节前规模场增量降重，散户与二次育肥出栏积极，集中出栏 带动生猪出栏均重下降。2 月 12 日当周，行业生猪出栏均重 126.05 公斤（周 环比-1.35 公斤），其中集团场均重 122.62 公斤（周环比-0.72 公斤）、散 户均重 139.6 ...

固 定 收 益 华福证券 2026 年 02 月 24 日 春节假期综述：海外波动难撼债市修复趋势 团队成员 投资要点： 益 专 题 1 月中旬以来债券市场修复的重要因素在于大行对于长债的持续净买 入。从 1 月信贷收支表看，大行与中小行新增信贷均低于去年同期，但存 款增速均有所回升，且大行的升幅更大，在此背景下大行配置债券的规模 也明显上升，显示在央行流动性宽松、大行负债相对充裕、但信贷需求整 体偏弱的环境下，大行配置债券的意愿有所提升。但相较于往年银行一般 都在年初配置短债不同，今年大行在二级市场增持长债是非常罕见的现象， 这一方面说明市场前期担忧的利率风险指标问题并未对大行的实际投资带 来显著影响，另一方面可能也部分反映了央行态度的变化。 Q4 货政报告对稳增长的诉求增强，由于信贷需求偏弱，货币政策对宽 松副作用的担忧也明显减弱。尽管降准降息可能需要根据整体政策部署综 合，但在稳增长的基调下预计央行在降息前仍将维持宽松的流动性环境， 同时也有望加大对国债的买入力度以配合财政。我们原本预计，在 10 年期 国债收益率突破 1.8%后，大行对 7-10 年国债的净买入力度可能下降，甚至 阶段性的转为净卖出， ...

证券研究报告|策略定期研究 2026年02月24日 QFII等主题右侧突破 ——主题形态学输出0222 证券分析师： 研究助理： 周浦寒 S0210524040007 杨逸帆 S0210124110046 请务必阅读报告末页的重要声明 华福证券 华福证券 投资要点 Ø 风险提示：历史经验不代表未来;行业不确定性风险;国内经济复苏速度不及预期;海外 降息节奏不及预期;地缘政治风险。 2 华福证券 华福证券 Ø 主题形态学，0222最新输出： l 1）右侧突破，新增：QFII，智谱AI。 l 2）右侧趋势，持续：光伏，POE胶膜，BC电池，靶材，电力物联网等。 l 3）底部企稳，持续：仿制药，智能物流，电动车，服务机器人，消费金融，白 酒，葡萄酒等。 l 4）底部反转，持续：六氟磷酸锂，锂电电解液，手机电池，白酒，品牌龙头。 录 n 主题形态学最新输出 n 风险提示 目 3 华福证券 华福证券 主题形态学的最新输出 4 华福证券 华福证券 l 1）右侧突破，新增：QFII，智谱AI。 l 2）右侧趋势，持续：光伏，POE胶膜，BC电池，靶材，电力物联网等。 l 3）底部企稳，持续：仿制药，智能物流，电动车，服务机 ...

证券研究报告|专题报告 金融工程 2026年2月24日 基于胜率与盈亏比的行业博弈策略 —— 概率驱动的行业轮动决策框架 证券分析师： 李杨 执业证书编号： S0210524100005 熊晓湛 执业证书编号： S0210524100006 请务必阅读报告末页的重要声明 华福证券 华福证券 投资要点 ➢ 概率思维 —将行业指数作为可重复博弈对象 我们将行业指数视为可重复参与的博弈对象，而非一次性的行情判断，以胜率 × 盈亏结构刻画行业在长期维度上的博弈价值。 在筛选阶段引入综合盈亏指标，对行业在不同市场环境中的成功概率与回报结构进行系统评估，优选具备正期望、能够穿越周期 的成功行业。 ➢ 逆周期筛选—选取历史上有成功经验的行业 在行业筛选过程中，不是仅依赖当期强弱做单期判断，而是对弱势行业引入历史排名记忆机制（参考其最近一次进入强势阶段时 的综合表现），并与当前强势行业统一比较。 该机制有助于在轮动与风格切换期间保留具备反转潜力的行业。 ➢ 应用凯利公式—进一步优化权重分配方案 Kelly 权重解决的是"在同一批入选行业中，资金该如何分配"。 在不改变行业筛选结果的前提下，基于各行业的胜率与盈亏结构进行差异化 ...

有色金属 2026 年 02 月 23 日 行 业 研 究 有色金属 20260223 周报：避险和滞涨交易仍是黄金交易的 核心，长期配置价值不改 投资要点： 行 业 定 期 报 告 贵金属：避险和滞涨交易仍是黄金交易的核心，长期配置价值不改。 美国一系列宏观经济数据发布，就业数据韧性及美联储官员一系列偏鹰派 言论削弱市场降息预期。市场主流对首次降息预期从此前6月延后至7月。 短期而言，美联储降息预期摇摆，整体呈现易涨难跌格局；中长期而言， 全球关税政策和地缘政治的不确定性背景下，避险和滞涨交易仍是黄金交 易的核心，长期配置价值不改。个股：1）黄金：关注招金灵宝万国紫金黄 金，A股关注紫金矿业、中金、赤峰及西金等；H股关注潼关、山金、招矿 及集海等。2）银铂钯：均为黄金的贝塔，个股关注盛达、湖银、豫光、贵 研及浩通等。 工业金属：降息预期博弈，工业金属预期震荡。铜，短期，美联储降 息预期仍在，基本面偏紧格局延续支撑铜价；中长期，随美联储降息加深 提振投资和消费，同时打开国内货币政策空间，叠加特朗普政府后续可能 宽财政带来的通胀反弹将支撑铜价中枢上移，新能源需求强劲将带动供需 缺口拉大，继续看好铜价。铝，短期， ...

Inflation Data - January CPI year-on-year growth decreased to 2.4%, below the market expectation of 2.5% and down from the previous value of 2.7%[2] - Core CPI also fell to 2.5%, down from 2.6%, marking the lowest level since April 2021[2] - Month-on-month, core CPI rose by 0.3%, in line with expectations, compared to a previous increase of 0.2%[2] Energy and Commodity Trends - Energy inflation dropped further, with January CPI energy component year-on-year growth at -0.1%, down from 2.3%[3] - Gasoline prices saw a year-on-year decline of -7.5%, contributing significantly to the overall energy inflation drop[3] - Core commodity inflation fell to 1.1% year-on-year, down from 1.4%, with used car prices plummeting to -2% year-on-year, a decline of 3.6 percentage points from the previous month[4] Service Inflation - Core service inflation decreased to 2.9% year-on-year, down from 3%, while month-on-month growth increased to 0.4% from 0.3%[4] - Housing inflation year-on-year was 3.3%, slightly down from 3.4%, indicating a continued moderation trend[4] - Medical services showed a rebound, with year-on-year growth rising to 3.9%[4] Market Reactions and Expectations - Following the inflation data release, U.S. stock indices experienced moderate gains, and the dollar index fell below 97[4] - The probability of the Federal Reserve lowering interest rates before June increased to 68%, up from 62%[4] - The yields on 2-year and 10-year U.S. Treasury bonds fell to 3.4% and 4.05%, respectively, both reaching new lows since November 2025[4]

Investment Highlights - The construction sector faced pressure in 2025, with the building materials sector showing signs of bottom recovery, as the building materials sector increased by 22.1%, outperforming the construction decoration sector which only rose by 6.7% [2][15][22]. Construction Sector Analysis - The construction sector is under significant fundamental pressure, with a focus on three main investment directions: overseas expansion through the "Belt and Road" initiative, resource value reassessment, and state-owned enterprise reform [3][5]. - The domestic traditional infrastructure investment growth rate is slowing, and real estate construction continues to weaken, limiting the improvement space for the sector [3][5]. - Companies with business transformation capabilities and those positioned in high-growth niche markets performed well, while engineering consulting firms faced pressure due to local government financial constraints [3][5]. Building Materials Sector Analysis - The building materials sector is experiencing structural differentiation, with some segments expected to reach a turning point, particularly consumer building materials [4][5]. - Despite weak real estate data, the marginal negative impact on the building materials sector has significantly decreased, with supply-side improvements expected to precede demand-side recovery [4][5]. - The cement industry is recovering from price bottoming, while the glass industry remains under pressure, and the fiberglass sector is seeing significant improvements due to structural demand [4][5][41][46]. Investment Recommendations - In the construction sector, focus on leading infrastructure companies benefiting from overseas projects and major engineering, such as China Communications Construction Company, China State Construction Engineering, and China Railway Construction Corporation [5]. - In the building materials sector, attention should be given to leading consumer building material companies like Sangke Tree, Oriental Yuhong, and Beixin Building Materials, as well as cyclical building material leaders like Huaxin Cement and China National Building Material [5]. Belt and Road Initiative - The "Belt and Road" initiative has created significant opportunities for the construction sector, with a notable increase in overseas orders and contracts signed in 2025, amounting to $257.98 billion, a 10.8% increase year-on-year [77][79]. - The demand for infrastructure in countries participating in the initiative is expected to grow rapidly, providing a substantial project pool for construction companies [77][79]. Resource Value Reassessment - The expectation of rising prices for non-ferrous metals is anticipated to benefit state-owned construction companies that have acquired valuable mineral resources through past projects [3][5]. State-Owned Enterprise Reform - Policies promoting the securitization of state-owned assets and mergers and acquisitions are expected to create value reassessment opportunities for state-owned construction companies with quality assets [3][5].

- The report introduces a quantitative model for evaluating equity funds, using 22 benchmark indices as independent variables and fund returns as dependent variables. The model applies a rolling window regression with a 6-month window to calculate the R² matrix for each fund. The benchmark index with the highest average R² over the last six periods is selected as the reference index for fund performance evaluation[18][19][24] - The construction process of the model involves linear regression for each benchmark index and fund return, followed by rolling window regression to derive the R² matrix. The formula used is $ R² = 1 - \frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n}(y_i - \hat{y}_i)^2}{\sum_{i=1}^{n}(y_i - \bar{y})^2} $, where $ y_i $ represents fund returns, $ \hat{y}_i $ represents predicted returns, and $ \bar{y} $ represents the mean of fund returns[18][19][24] - The model is evaluated as effective in identifying the most relevant benchmark index for fund performance, providing a robust framework for fund classification and strategy analysis[18][24] - The backtesting results of the model show that the average R² value for equity funds decreased slightly from 0.7478 in December to 0.7336 in January, indicating a slight reduction in the fit of funds to single benchmark indices[34] - The report categorizes equity funds into five styles: large-cap, mid-small-cap, value, growth, and thematic sectors. The classification is based on the benchmark index with the highest R² value derived from the model[24][27][33] - The performance of mid-small-cap funds was the highest in January, with a median return of 8.18%, followed by growth funds at 7.08%, large-cap funds at 4.13%, value funds at 3.88%, and thematic sector funds at 3.37%[24][25][27] - The thematic sector funds are further divided into categories such as healthcare, cyclical, infrastructure, consumption, technology, finance, and advanced manufacturing. Among these, cyclical funds performed the best, with an average return of 21.6% for active funds and 18.2% for passive funds[27][30][32] - The report highlights high-rated funds, defined as AAA and AA+ funds, which demonstrate strong alpha sustainability and upward alpha trends. AAA funds are stable alpha-type funds suitable for long-term holdings, while AA+ funds exhibit steadily increasing alpha values, indicating strong potential for excess returns[47][48][49] - The report identifies new emerging funds, defined as funds receiving their first rating this month and managed by fund managers with less than three years of experience. These funds predominantly track indices such as CSI Dividend and CSI 300[63][64] - The report also highlights funds with significant rating upgrades, defined as funds whose ratings improved substantially compared to the previous month. These funds are primarily aligned with indices such as CSI Cyclical, CSI Dividend, and TMT (CITIC)[65][66]