策略专题：“慢长牛”在途，怎么追，怎么切？

Group 1 - The report discusses the "slow bull market" and how to navigate it, highlighting the systematic increase in index slope during the liquidity bull market from 2014 to 2015, with industry "bloom periods" becoming shorter [1][10] - It notes that from Q2 2014 to the peak in 2015, there was a significant rotation among industries, with leading sectors experiencing substantial underperformance in subsequent periods [15][16] - The report emphasizes that during the liquidity bull market, the market was less sensitive to fundamentals, with ROE becoming relatively important only during phases of poor profitability [22][31] Group 2 - The exploration of acceleration models indicates that during the liquidity bull market, the fundamental performance was not a major concern, and only in phases of poor profitability did ROE gain significance [22][31] - The report outlines that the reasonable forward valuation level for the ChiNext index during the bull market was between 81.0x and 102x, with a minimum of 15% overvaluation during peak periods [31][34] - It highlights that companies or sectors that cannot be precisely valued often end up in a state of high bubble, using LeTV as a case study where its market value exceeded 100 billion due to speculative trading [34][38] Group 3 - The report analyzes the cashing-out model, indicating that preemptive cashing out often requires event-driven catalysts, with examples such as the merger of China South Locomotive and China North Locomotive [43][46] - It discusses how high-amplitude stocks can create continuous excess returns, with higher daily volatility correlating with increased chances of excess returns during upward trends [49][50] - The report concludes that index resonance upward relies on structural rotation and the stability of high-position stocks, which can provide positive feedback to market sentiment [55][59]