反内卷政策或带来双重拐点

Policy Development - The "anti-involution" policy was first proposed in July 2024 during a Central Political Bureau meeting, aiming to prevent "involutionary" competition[1] - By December 2024, the focus shifted from risk warning to specific rectification actions, indicating a move towards comprehensive governance[1] - In 2025, the policy became a frequent topic in high-level meetings, with actionable measures being implemented across various industries[1] Industry-Specific Measures - Different industries have varied approaches to "anti-involution," focusing on capacity control and price guidance[1] - Key strategies include controlling new capacity, eliminating outdated capacity, and encouraging mergers and acquisitions[1] - The coal industry aims to control total production and ensure that long-term contracts cover over 80% of output[12] - The steel industry is focusing on low emissions and halting new capacity replacements to curb disordered expansion[15] Expected Outcomes - The "anti-involution" policy may lead to a dual inflection point: a downward trend in capacity surplus and an upward trend in the Producer Price Index (PPI)[1] - As of Q2 2025, the growth rate of industrial capacity has slightly fallen below GDP growth, indicating a potential acceleration in resolving capacity surplus[24] - The relationship between capacity surplus and PPI suggests that as capacity surplus decreases, PPI is likely to rise[24] Risks - Potential risks include slower-than-expected implementation of "anti-involution" policies, geopolitical risks, and the possibility of historical patterns failing to hold[30]