欧洲经验之市场记分牌制度：——统一大市场研究系列二

Group 1: Core Conclusions - The tax competition index and tax refund rate for listed companies in China are currently at a 20-year high, indicating the urgent need for a unified market in China[2] - The European Single Market Scoreboard system provides valuable insights for China's unified market construction, focusing on historical context and operational mechanisms[2] Group 2: European Single Market Scoreboard - The Scoreboard uses a "traffic light" system to evaluate member states' performance, categorizing them as "green" (above average), "yellow" (average), or "red" (below average)[3] - It consists of three dimensions: Enforcement tools, Business Framework Conditions, and Outcomes and Competitiveness, with multiple quantifiable sub-indicators under each dimension[3][13] Group 3: Advantages of the Scoreboard - The evaluation system is quantifiable, allowing for cross-regional and temporal comparisons, with regular publication of results[3][14] - The Scoreboard emphasizes support for small and medium-sized enterprises, which can be a reference for China's market development[3][14] Group 4: Operational Mechanisms - The Enforcement tools dimension includes six indicators to assess the correct implementation of EU market rules, such as transposition deficit and infringement proceedings[6][35] - The Business Framework Conditions dimension evaluates member states' performance in creating a conducive business environment, with six indicators including market supervision and access to public procurement[9][10] Group 5: Implications for China - The Scoreboard's comprehensive evaluation can guide China in establishing its own unified market framework, focusing on governance, performance, and competitiveness[3][14] - The emphasis on resolving cross-border disputes and sharing government information through systems like IMI, SOLVIT, and EURES can enhance China's market efficiency[3][14]