申万宏源策略一周回顾展望(25/11/03-25/11/08)：抢跑26年景气展望的行情不断演进

Group 1 - The short-term market structure indicates that technology growth has insufficient long-term cost-effectiveness, leading to high-level fluctuations while waiting for industrial trend catalysts to accumulate [1][5][6] - The recent narrow fluctuations of the Shanghai Composite Index and the wide fluctuations in technology growth reflect a lack of dominant structures to lead the market breakthrough [2][5][6] - The historical experience shows that when long-term cost-effectiveness is low, the difficulty of earning valuation money significantly increases, requiring continuous verification of industrial catalysts and high growth in performance to sustain effective upward trends [2][5][6] Group 2 - The mid-term market judgment maintains a "two-stage bull market" theory, with 2025's technology structure bull market being the first stage, and the spring of 2026 potentially marking a phase peak [7][8] - The market may face three challenges in spring 2026: verification of demand-side key periods, increased sensitivity to performance disturbances and liquidity shocks in low cost-effectiveness areas, and the need for time to wait for new structural highlights in the domestic technology industry [7][8] - The bull market is expected to have depth, with conditions for a comprehensive bull market becoming increasingly sufficient over time, and at least three mid-term returns yet to be realized [8] Group 3 - The economic direction for the next year is expected to evolve with a rotation in the fourth quarter, driven by the price increase cycle and the anticipated turning point in PPI [10] - The rotation of sectors will continue, with potential upward opportunities in the AI industry chain, humanoid robots, innovative pharmaceuticals, and national defense industries [10] - The report highlights that the market has already begun to anticipate the economic improvement of 2026, with the electricity equipment sector nearing low cost-effectiveness and the price increase cycle showing short-term cost-effectiveness limitations [10]