牛市中岁末还会出现风格切换吗

Group 1 - The report indicates that in November, small themes often outperform, but this year may not have similar liquidity support, suggesting that November themes are likely to continue, while the probability of December outperforming is low [6][12][13] - Historical analysis shows that in past bull markets, the main style often remains strong in November and December under strong liquidity support, with complete non-switching observed in 2005 and 2006 [6][29][31] - The report highlights that if a switch occurs in November or December, it typically involves a high-low switch, with the possibility of returning to the main line in early next year [6][46][49] Group 2 - The report emphasizes that the lack of significant improvement in incremental funds is a crucial factor, with current public fund holdings being extreme and new account openings slowing down [6][51][56] - It suggests that after the November theme performance, if there is no further clarity from policy, banks and white goods should be considered for allocation, as they currently have a higher probability of success [6][58][73] - The report notes that the white goods sector has a high probability of outperforming in December, with historical data showing an 81.3% success rate since 2009 [6][61][63] Group 3 - The report discusses the conditions under which the calendar effect for banks in January may fail, noting that since 2009, banks have a 75% probability of outperforming in January [6][66][68] - It highlights that exceptions to this trend occurred in 2010, 2015, 2020, and 2023 due to regulatory tightening and market conditions [6][69][70] - The report concludes that the potential for a switch in the main line direction may occur, particularly towards banks and cyclical sectors that lag behind in performance from January to October [6][73]