Workflow
中邮因子周报:估值风格显著,风格切换迹象显现-20251110
China Post Securities·2025-11-10 08:03

Quantitative Models and Construction 1. Model Name: Barra Style Factors - Model Construction Idea: The Barra style factors are designed to capture various market characteristics such as valuation, momentum, volatility, and growth, among others, to explain stock returns[14][15] - Model Construction Process: - The factors are calculated based on specific financial and market metrics. For example: - Beta: Historical beta - Size: Natural logarithm of total market capitalization - Momentum: Weighted average of historical excess return series - Volatility: Weighted average of historical residual return volatility - Valuation: Inverse of price-to-book ratio - Liquidity: Weighted average of turnover ratios (monthly, quarterly, yearly) - Profitability: Weighted average of various profitability metrics such as analyst forecasted earnings-to-price ratio, inverse of price-to-cash flow ratio, and inverse of trailing twelve-month price-to-earnings ratio - Growth: Weighted average of earnings growth rate and revenue growth rate - Leverage: Weighted average of market leverage, book leverage, and debt-to-asset ratio[15] - Model Evaluation: The model is widely used in the industry to capture systematic risk factors and explain stock returns. It is considered robust and comprehensive in its approach to factor construction[14][15] 2. Model Name: GRU (Generalized Risk Utility) Model - Model Construction Idea: GRU models are used to capture complex relationships in stock returns by leveraging advanced statistical and machine learning techniques. They are designed to identify patterns in historical data and predict future performance[4][6][8] - Model Construction Process: - GRU models are trained on historical data to identify patterns in stock returns - The models are applied to different stock pools (e.g., CSI 300, CSI 500, CSI 1000) to evaluate their performance - Specific GRU models include barra1d, barra5d, open1d, and close1d, which differ in their time horizons and data inputs[4][6][8] - Model Evaluation: GRU models show mixed performance, with some models like barra5d and close1d performing strongly, while others like barra1d exhibit significant drawdowns in certain periods[4][6][8] --- Model Backtesting Results 1. Barra Style Factors - Momentum: Weekly return 3.49%, monthly return -6.50%, YTD return -14.88%[17] - Beta: Weekly return 2.21%, monthly return -7.75%, YTD return 28.44%[17] - Volatility: Weekly return 1.90%, monthly return -3.76%, YTD return 6.09%[17] - Liquidity: Weekly return 1.67%, monthly return 46.39%, YTD return 8.77%[17] - Size: Weekly return 0.45%, monthly return -6.89%, YTD return -39.47%[17] - Non-linear Size: Weekly return 0.28%, monthly return -6.47%, YTD return -34.37%[17] - Growth: Weekly return 0.22%, monthly return 2.03%, YTD return 0.89%[17] - Profitability: Weekly return 1.43%, monthly return 3.55%, YTD return 14.39%[17] - Leverage: Weekly return 2.13%, monthly return 4.08%, YTD return 16.59%[17] - Valuation: Weekly return 3.52%, monthly return 6.78%, YTD return 4.37%[17] 2. GRU Models - barra1d: Weekly return -0.34%, monthly return -0.65%, YTD return 4.71%[33][34] - barra5d: Weekly return 1.44%, monthly return 5.42%, YTD return 7.34%[33][34] - open1d: Weekly return 0.32%, monthly return 1.81%, YTD return 6.02%[33][34] - close1d: Weekly return 1.41%, monthly return 4.17%, YTD return 4.33%[33][34] - Multi-factor Combination: Weekly return 0.57%, monthly return 2.54%, YTD return 0.89%[33][34] --- Quantitative Factors and Construction 1. Factor Name: Fundamental Factors - Factor Construction Idea: Fundamental factors are derived from financial metrics to capture the underlying financial health and performance of companies[4][6][7] - Factor Construction Process: - Metrics such as return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and revenue growth are calculated using trailing twelve-month (TTM) data - Factors are industry-neutralized before testing[19] - Factor Evaluation: Fundamental factors show mixed performance, with some factors like "growth" and "profitability" performing well, while others like "static financial factors" exhibit negative returns in certain periods[4][6][7] 2. Factor Name: Technical Factors - Factor Construction Idea: Technical factors are based on price and volume data to capture market trends and investor behavior[4][6][7] - Factor Construction Process: - Metrics such as momentum, volatility, and turnover are calculated over different time horizons (e.g., 20-day, 60-day, 120-day) - Factors are industry-neutralized before testing[19] - Factor Evaluation: Technical factors generally show positive returns for momentum-based factors, while volatility-based factors often exhibit negative returns[4][6][7] --- Factor Backtesting Results 1. Fundamental Factors (CSI 300) - ROA Growth: Weekly return 0.38%, monthly return 2.38%, YTD return 26.31%[23] - Net Profit Surprise Growth: Weekly return 1.10%, monthly return 2.62%, YTD return 42.59%[23] - ROC Surprise Growth: Weekly return 2.23%, monthly return 2.23%, YTD return 35.35%[23] 2. Technical Factors (CSI 500) - 20-day Momentum: Weekly return 5.99%, monthly return 1.74%, YTD return 3.65%[26] - 120-day Momentum: Weekly return 1.76%, monthly return 4.01%, YTD return 3.55%[26] - 20-day Volatility: Weekly return -1.15%, monthly return -4.31%, YTD return 25.86%[26]