固定收益点评：退名单后的城投有何变化？

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - Since 2025, the announcements of "zeroing out" implicit debts in various regions have become more frequent, and the pace of urban investment platforms exiting the list has significantly accelerated. As of October 30, 2025, 70 regions across the country have officially announced the achievement of implicit debt zeroing out, with district - and county - level units being the main battlefield for debt resolution [1][7]. - The number of financing platforms has decreased by over 70%. Jiangsu Province has the highest number of exits, mainly district - and county - level non - bond - issuing platforms. The next stage of the "exit list" work may focus on higher - level bond - issuing entities [1][12]. - After exiting the list, the credit evaluation of urban investment platforms has entered a new stage of significant differentiation. In the short term, liquidity is crucial; in the medium term, the focus is on hematopoietic ability; in the long term, the key lies in functional positioning [3]. 3. Summary According to the Table of Contents 3.1 "One - Package Debt Resolution" Anniversary with Remarkable Achievements and Many Regions Announcing Zero Implicit Debts - Since the introduction of the "one - package debt resolution plan" in November 2024, the local debt resolution work has advanced for nearly a year. By October 30, 2025, 70 regions announced zero implicit debts, including 11 prefecture - level and 59 district - and county - level units [1][7]. - Other regions have also disclosed clear goals for zeroing out implicit debts, such as Shandong aiming for zero implicit debts by the end of 2028 and Shaoxing, Zhejiang achieving zero implicit debts by the end of 2025 [7]. 3.2 Over 70% Reduction in the Number of Financing Platforms and Their Characteristics 3.2.1 Jiangsu Province Has the Most Announced Exit - List Entities, Mainly District - and County - Level Non - Bond - Issuing Entities - As of September 2025, the number of national financing platforms and the scale of outstanding operating financial debts decreased by 71% and 62% respectively compared to March 2023. Among the 447 "exit - list" urban investment entities officially disclosed since 2022, Jiangsu accounted for nearly 70%, followed by Henan with 36, Chongqing with 29, and Qinghai with 13 [12]. - District - and county - level urban investment entities were the main body, and non - bond - issuing entities accounted for 94% [12]. 3.2.2 The Next Stage of the "Exit - List" Work May Focus on Higher - Level Bond - Issuing Entities - The current debt resolution path is to prioritize cleaning up platforms with simple debt relationships and small market impacts. Based on the fact that over 70% of financing platforms have exited, it is estimated that the implicit debts of district - and county - level urban investment in some provinces may have been mostly resolved, and the next stage may focus on higher - level bond - issuing entities [19]. 3.3 Insights into the Transformation Direction of Urban Investment from Asset - Liability Changes 3.3.1 Limited New Bond Issuance after Exiting the List, with Marginal Improvement in Bank Liquidity Support - Among the 447 entities that announced exiting the financing platform list, 420 were non - bond - issuing entities. Focusing on the 27 bond - issuing entities, as of June 30, 2025, only 4 of the 18 entities with outstanding bonds increased their bond scale compared to June 30, 2024 [23]. - According to the semi - annual report data in 2025, the short - term borrowing balance of these exit - list bond - issuing entities increased by 40.61% year - on - year, the bond balance increased slightly by 6%, and the long - term borrowing decreased slightly by 0.72%. The liquidity support from commercial banks for "exit - list" entities has improved [23]. 3.3.2 Changes in Assets and Liabilities of Urban Investment after Exiting the List - Asset Side: The pace of project construction has slowed down, and the asset management function has been enhanced. Urban investment enterprises have become more cautious in new project investments. The significant increase in fixed assets may be due to the injection of operating assets by local governments, aiming to enhance the platform's hematopoietic ability [2][29]. - Liability Side: Short - term liquidity support is prominent, and the long - term financing function needs to be restored. The growth of long - term borrowing is low. Local governments prioritize liquidity safety, and new project investments are more cautious. Special bonds have replaced some bank medium - and long - term loans to some extent [2][32]. 3.4 How to Evaluate the Credit of Urban Investment after Exiting the List 3.4.1 Market Perception Has Matured, and Valuation and Credit Qualifications Are Becoming More Differentiated - The market reaction has gone through stages from significant initial divergence and limited pricing differentiation to subsequent convergence of expectations and finally entered a new stage of significant differentiation based on individual qualifications. The future market will conduct more refined credit evaluations of exit - list entities [33]. 3.4.2 Reconstruction of the Credit Framework - Short - Term Focus on Liquidity, Medium - Term on Hematopoietic Ability, and Long - Term on Functional Positioning - Short - term: The key is to evaluate the thickness of the liquidity safety cushion, including the coverage of short - term debts by monetary funds, available bank credit lines, and the scale of high - quality realizable assets [37]. - Medium - term: The core is to examine the transformation effectiveness and independent survival ability of the platform, mainly looking at the proportion of operating business income, profit quality, and net inflow of operating cash flow [38]. - Long - term: The key is to determine the platform's irreplaceability in the local economic ecosystem and the sustainability of its business model. Its credit foundation will shift from "implicit government guarantee" to "endogenous value" [38].