沪胶，空头优势减弱

Group 1: Report Industry Investment Rating - No relevant content provided Group 2: Core View of the Report - The short - position advantage of Shanghai rubber futures 2601 contract has weakened, and it is expected to maintain a volatile consolidation trend in the future [5][6] Group 3: Summary of Specific Content Market Performance - Yesterday, the Shanghai rubber futures 2601 contract showed a trend of shrinking volume, reducing positions, weakening volatility, and a slight decline. The intraday price center was around 15,300 yuan/ton, with a minimum of 15,050 yuan/ton. The closing price decreased by 0.33% to 15,320 yuan/ton. The positions decreased by 4,116 hands to 109,679 hands, a decrease of 3.62% [2] Position Changes in Long and Short Positions - The positions of the Shanghai rubber futures 2601 contract showed a situation where both long and short positions decreased. The long positions decreased by 1,268 hands to 62,567 hands, and the short positions decreased by 4,619 hands to 77,982 hands. The net short position shrank to 15,415 hands [2] Changes in the Top 20 Long - Position Seats - Among the top 20 long - position seats of the Shanghai rubber futures 2601 contract, 15 seats reduced long positions. No seat reduced more than 500 long positions. 8 seats reduced between 100 and 500 long positions, including Guotai Junan Futures, CITIC Futures, Dongzheng Futures, etc. The remaining 7 seats reduced less than 100 long positions [2] Changes in the Top 20 Short - Position Seats - Among the top 20 short - position seats, 11 seats reduced short positions. 3 seats reduced more than 500 short positions, namely Guotai Junan Futures, Huatai Futures, and Dongzheng Futures. 4 seats reduced between 100 and 500 short positions, including Guotou Futures, Yong'an Futures, etc. The remaining 4 seats reduced less than 100 short positions [3] Operations of Multi - to - Short and Short - to - Long - 4 seats carried out multi - to - short operations, including GF Futures, Chuangyuan Futures, Xinhu Futures, and Nanhua Futures, indicating that they thought the subsequent rebound momentum was insufficient. Only 1 seat, CITIC Construction Investment Futures, carried out short - to - long operations, indicating that it thought the upward momentum still existed [5]