30Y国债的“前世今生”：供需结构、定价权迁移与曲线重定价

Group 1 - The pricing power of 30Y government bonds has undergone three migrations, driven by the "asset shortage" and improvement in liquidity [1] - Before 2022, the focus on 30Y government bonds was low, with supply significantly lower than that of 10Y bonds, leading to weak liquidity and primarily driven by insurance companies [9][16] - From 2022 to 2024, the pricing power of 30Y government bonds shifted towards trading accounts, becoming a market "barometer" as liquidity improved and trading activity increased [18] Group 2 - The current situation of 30Y government bonds is characterized by a relief of the "asset shortage" and a mismatch in supply and demand structures [49] - The easing of the "asset shortage" is reflected in the steady rise of the Shanghai Composite Index and the continuous increase in dividend yields, indicating a shift in economic expectations [50][54] - The supply-demand contradiction arises from the mismatch between the long-term supply of government bonds and the short-term liquidity provided, leading to an oversupply of 30Y bonds [60] Group 3 - The pricing logic for 30Y government bonds has changed, with the market now requiring higher risk compensation due to the shift from a "supply-demand balance" to an "oversupply" situation [69] - The transition of pricing power may revert back to the allocation accounts as trading accounts face challenges in the current volatile market [74] - To alleviate the upward pressure on 30Y government bond yields, two main paths exist: adjusting prices to a more attractive range for allocation accounts and improving liquidity in the market [82]