如何看待银行承接长债指标压力,如何缓解?
GOLDEN SUN SECURITIES·2025-12-26 12:14
  1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core View of the Report Since mid - to late November, long - term bonds, especially ultra - long bonds, have undergone significant adjustments, possibly due to banks' selling under year - end duration indicator constraints. The mismatch between banks' asset and liability durations has intensified, with some state - owned banks' bank book interest rate risk indicators approaching regulatory limits. In 2026, the regulatory standards for bank book interest rate risk are likely to be adjusted. Possible adjustment methods include lowering the interest rate shock amplitude, relaxing regulatory indicator upper limits, and using special treasury bonds to supplement primary capital. It is expected that the probability of lowering the shock amplitude and issuing special treasury bonds to supplement capital next year is relatively high, and the indicator pressure will be alleviated compared to this year [1][2][4]. 3. Summary by Directory 3.1 Bank Book Interest Rate Indicator Regulatory Policy Evolution After the 2008 international financial crisis, the importance of bank account interest rate risk management became prominent. In 2009, the CBRC issued the "Guidelines for the Management of Commercial Bank Account Interest Rate Risk". In 2016, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision released standards for bank book interest rate risk. In 2017, China comprehensively revised the 2009 guidelines. In July 2024, the Basel Committee revised the bank book interest rate shock scenario, to be officially implemented on January 1, 2026, with the "parallel upward" shock amplitude for interest rates adjusted from 250BP to 225BP [8][9]. 3.2 State - owned Banks' ΔEVE/Net Primary Capital Approaching the Upper Limit Banks divide financial assets into TPL, AC, and OCI accounts. AC and OCI accounts, mainly for allocation, face bank book interest rate risk management indicators. Due to the shortening of liability duration and the lengthening of asset duration, the mismatch between banks' asset and liability durations has intensified. In 2024, the ΔEVE/Net Primary Capital of Agricultural Bank of China (-14.31%), Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (-14.71%), and China Construction Bank (-14.73%) was close to the - 15% regulatory limit [10][19]. 3.3 How to Alleviate Bank Book Interest Rate Risk? - 2025 Risk Calculation: Calculate the 2025 year - end ΔEVE based on the increment of AC and OCI financial investments and their growth rate; calculate the 2025 year - end estimated value of primary capital based on the cumulative year - on - year growth rate from Q3 2025 to Q3 2024; then calculate the theoretical value of ΔEVE/primary capital for each major bank. It is expected that the indicators of Agricultural Bank, Industrial and Commercial Bank, and China Construction Bank will exceed the 15% regulatory red line, and the indicators of Agricultural Bank, Industrial and Commercial Bank, China Construction Bank, and Bank of China will deteriorate marginally in 2025 [22]. - 2026 Possible Measures: - Lowering Interest Rate Shock Amplitude: Lower the parallel upward shock amplitude of RMB in the IRRBB standard by 25BP from January 1, 2026. Static calculations based on 2025 forecast data show that the regulatory buffer space of △EVE/Net Primary Capital increases by 1.3%, and it can support large - scale banks to undertake 30 - year government bonds worth 649 billion yuan. For 5 - year and 10 - year bonds, the supportable scales are 2.8 trillion yuan and 1.3 trillion yuan respectively [2][23]. - Relaxing Regulatory Indicator Upper Limits: Static calculations based on 2025 forecast data show that when the regulatory indicator is raised by 1%, the regulatory buffer space of △EVE/Net Primary Capital can support large - scale banks to undertake 30 - year government bonds worth 484 billion yuan. For 5 - year and 10 - year bonds, the supportable scales are 2.0612 trillion yuan and 968.9 billion yuan respectively. If the regulatory indicator is raised by 2%, the supportable incremental scales for 5 - year, 10 - year, and 30 - year government bonds are 4.1225 trillion yuan, 1.9379 trillion yuan, and 968 billion yuan respectively [3][24][26]. - Supplementing Primary Capital with Special Treasury Bonds: This year, 50 billion yuan of special treasury bonds have been issued to support state - owned large - scale banks to supplement capital. If Agricultural Bank and Industrial and Commercial Bank each have 25 billion yuan of primary capital increase next year, based on the △EVE/primary capital regulatory requirement of 15%, the △EVE released by the 50 billion yuan of supplementary primary capital can support large - scale banks to undertake incremental scales of 5 - year, 10 - year, and 30 - year government bonds of 1.0166 trillion yuan, 477.9 billion yuan, and 238.7 billion yuan respectively. It is less likely to raise the regulatory threshold of "ΔEVE/primary capital" in IRRBB, while it is more likely to lower the interest rate shock amplitude and issue additional special treasury bonds to supplement capital. After these measures, the pressure on IRRBB in 2026 is expected to be alleviated compared to this year [3][4][28].
如何看待银行承接长债指标压力,如何缓解? - Reportify