Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the content Core Viewpoints of the Report - Last week (from January 5th to January 9th, 2026), the median weekly return of equity ETFs was 4.31%. Among broad - based ETFs, the median return of Science and Technology Innovation Board ETFs was 10.15%, the highest. By sector, the median return of technology ETFs was 7.28%, the highest. By theme, the median return of military - themed ETFs was 13.50%, the highest [1][12][16]. - Last week, equity ETFs had a net redemption of 803 million yuan, but the overall scale increased by 18.0114 billion yuan. Among broad - based ETFs, CSI 500ETF had the most net subscriptions, reaching 3.648 billion yuan; by sector, cyclical ETFs had the most net subscriptions, at 13.524 billion yuan; by hot theme, pharmaceutical ETFs had the most net subscriptions, at 892 million yuan [1][2][28]. Summary by Relevant Catalogs ETF Performance - The median weekly return of equity ETFs last week was 4.31%. The median returns of Science and Technology Innovation Board ETFs, CSI 500ETF, CSI 1000ETF, A500ETF, ChiNext - related ETFs, SSE 50ETF, and CSI 300ETF were 10.15%, 7.89%, 7.05%, 4.22%, 3.87%, 3.38%, and 2.78% respectively. The median returns of commodity - type, cross - border, money - market, and bond - type ETFs were 2.92%, 2.55%, 0.02%, and - 0.01% respectively [1][12]. - By sector, the median returns of technology, consumer, cyclical, and large - finance sector ETFs among equity ETFs last week were 7.28%, 4.95%, 4.15%, and 1.82% respectively. By hot theme, the median returns of military, chip, and AI ETFs among equity ETFs were 13.50%, 11.17%, and 8.51% respectively, showing relatively strong performance, while the median returns of bank, dividend, and securities ETFs were - 1.88%, 1.62%, and 1.91% respectively, showing relatively weak performance [16]. ETF Scale Change and Net Subscription/Redeem - As of last Friday, the scales of equity, cross - border, and bond ETFs were 398.11 billion yuan, 101.07 billion yuan, and 76.46 billion yuan respectively. The scales of commodity - type and money - market ETFs were relatively small, at 26.47 billion yuan and 16.21 billion yuan respectively [20]. - Among broad - based ETFs, CSI 300ETF and A500ETF had relatively large scales, at 122.08 billion yuan and 29.96 billion yuan respectively. The scales of Science and Technology Innovation Board, CSI 500, CSI 1000, SSE 50, and ChiNext - related ETFs were relatively small, at 23.25 billion yuan, 21.00 billion yuan, 19.51 billion yuan, 18.99 billion yuan, and 18.02 billion yuan respectively [20]. - By sector, as of last Friday, the scale of technology sector ETFs was 47.09 billion yuan, followed by cyclical sector ETFs at 24.83 billion yuan. The scales of large - finance and consumer ETFs were relatively small, at 20.10 billion yuan and 19.19 billion yuan respectively. By hot theme, as of last Friday, the scales of chip, securities, and pharmaceutical ETFs were the highest, at 16.17 billion yuan, 14.31 billion yuan, and 10.88 billion yuan respectively [26]. - Last week, equity ETFs had a net redemption of 803 million yuan, and the overall scale increased by 18.0114 billion yuan; money - market ETFs had a net redemption of 1.0539 billion yuan, and the overall scale decreased by 1.0525 billion yuan. Among broad - based ETFs, CSI 500ETF had the most net subscriptions, at 3.648 billion yuan, and its scale increased by 1.8996 billion yuan; A500ETF had the most net redemptions, at 1.3087 billion yuan, and its scale decreased by 59.5 million yuan [28]. - By sector, last week, cyclical ETFs had the most net subscriptions, at 13.524 billion yuan, and their scale increased by 2.9669 billion yuan; technology ETFs had the most net redemptions, at 763 million yuan, and their scale increased by 3.5292 billion yuan. By hot theme, last week, pharmaceutical ETFs had the most net subscriptions, at 892 million yuan, and their scale increased by 893.9 million yuan; AI ETFs had the most net redemptions, at 538.9 million yuan, and their scale decreased by 9.2 million yuan [31]. ETF Benchmark Index Valuation - In broad - based ETFs, the price - to - earnings ratios of SSE 50ETF, CSI 300ETF, CSI 500ETF, CSI 1000ETF, ChiNext - related ETFs, and A500ETF were at the 89.27%, 90.68%, 100.00%, 100.00%, 66.50%, and 99.74% quantile levels respectively, and the price - to - book ratios were at the 73.68%, 75.83%, 100.00%, 79.37%, 67.90%, and 99.74% quantile levels respectively. Since December 31, 2019, the current price - to - earnings and price - to - book ratios of Science and Technology Innovation Board - related ETFs are at the 92.00% and 79.79% quantile levels respectively. Compared with the previous week, the valuation quantiles of CSI 1000 and Science and Technology Innovation Board ETFs increased significantly [34][36]. - As of last Friday, the price - to - earnings ratios of cyclical, large - finance, consumer, and technology sector ETFs were at the 87.54%, 29.87%, 37.87%, and 98.43% quantile levels respectively, and their price - to - book ratios were at the 83.91%, 57.34%, 45.26%, and 96.04% quantile levels respectively. Compared with the previous week, the valuation quantiles of consumer ETFs increased significantly [38]. - Among themed ETFs, the price - to - earnings quantiles of military, photovoltaic, and chip ETFs were relatively high, at 100.00%, 99.75%, and 98.60% respectively; the price - to - book quantiles of AI, robot, and dividend ETFs were relatively high, at 100.00%, 98.93%, and 98.35% respectively. Compared with the previous week, the valuation quantiles of pharmaceutical ETFs increased significantly [39][42]. - Overall, among broad - based ETFs, the valuation quantiles of ChiNext - related ETFs and SSE 50ETF were relatively low; by sector, the valuation quantiles of large - finance and consumer ETFs were relatively moderate; by sub - theme, the valuation quantiles of liquor and new energy vehicle ETFs were relatively low [43]. ETF Margin Trading - As of last Thursday, the margin trading balance of equity ETFs increased from 46.967 billion yuan in the previous week to 48.697 billion yuan, and the short - selling volume increased from 2.394 billion shares in the previous week to 2.420 billion shares [44]. - Among the top 10 ETFs with the highest average daily margin purchases and short - selling volumes from last Monday to Thursday, securities ETFs and Science and Technology Innovation Board ETFs had relatively high average daily margin purchases, while CSI 300ETF and CSI 1000ETF had relatively high average daily short - selling volumes [48][50]. ETF Managers - As of last Friday, Huaxia Fund ranked first in the total scale of listed non - money ETFs, and also had a relatively high management scale in multiple sub - fields such as scale index ETFs, theme, style, and strategy index ETFs, and cross - border ETFs; E Fund ranked second in the total scale of listed non - money ETFs, and had a relatively high management scale in scale index ETFs and cross - border ETFs; Huatai - PineBridge Fund ranked third in the total scale of listed non - money ETFs, and had a relatively high management scale in scale index ETFs and theme, style, and strategy index ETFs [52]. - Last week, 2 new ETFs were established, namely GF China Securities Industrial Software Theme ETF and ICBC ChiNext New Energy ETF. This week, 9 ETFs will be issued, including Penghua China Securities Consumer Electronics Theme ETF, Yin Hua S&P Hong Kong Stock Connect Low - Volatility Dividend ETF, Fullgoal China Securities Smart - Selected Shipbuilding Industry ETF, Guotai Hang Seng Biotechnology ETF, China Merchants China Securities Photovoltaic Industry ETF, Ping An Hang Seng Hong Kong Stock Connect Technology Theme ETF, Qianhai Kaiyuan Hang Seng Hong Kong Stock Connect Technology Theme ETF, Taikang China Securities Non - ferrous Metal Mining Theme ETF, and Invesco Great Wall China Securities Non - ferrous Metal Mining Theme ETF [55].
上周军工、芯片主题领涨，股票型ETF规模突破39800亿
Guoxin Securities·2026-01-11 09:06