25Q4主动权益基金季报分析：主动权益四季度加仓周期减持科技，永赢主动权益规模突破千亿

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Report's Core View - In Q4 2025, active equity funds decreased their scale, with the scale dropping from about 4 trillion yuan in Q3 to about 3.85 trillion yuan, a decline of 4.14%. Meanwhile, the scale of index funds slightly increased. [10] - The performance of active equity funds in Q4 2025 significantly declined compared to the previous quarter, with about 42.8% of the funds achieving positive returns, and the median return rate was -1.02%. [15] - Active equity funds reduced their holdings in technology and pharmaceutical sectors in Q4 2025 and increased their positions in cyclical sectors. [1] 3. Summary According to Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Fund Four - Quarter Report Investment Outlook Keywords - Technology, consumption, and computing power were the key areas of focus for active equity fund managers in Q4. The trend keywords included "repair", "recovery", and "resilience"; industry - related keywords were "technology", "consumption", and "electronics"; theme - related keywords were "computing power", "robotics", and "new energy"; and event - related keywords were "interest rate cuts", "exports", and "tariffs". [7] 3.2 Performance and Scale Dimension - Scale Change: The scale of active equity funds decreased in Q4 2025, while the scale of index funds slightly increased. Fund companies such as Yongying and Guojin saw significant growth in their active equity management scale, with Yongying's active equity scale exceeding 100 billion yuan. [10][14] - Performance: The overall performance of active equity funds in Q4 2025 declined significantly. About 42.8% of the funds achieved positive returns, and the median return rate was -1.02%. The top - performing funds in Q4 mainly focused on industries such as military, non - ferrous metals, and communications. [15][17] - Position and Heavy - Holding Stock Allocation: The overall position of active equity funds decreased in Q4 2025, with the average stock position dropping to 87.70% (-1.05%), and the Hong Kong stock position also significantly decreasing. The heavy - holding stocks in Hong Kong decreased, while the allocation ratios of heavy - holding stocks in CSI 300, CSI 500, and CSI 1000 increased. [18][19] - Large - Scale Funds: The scale of some large - scale active equity funds decreased in Q4 2025, but some funds such as Yongying Ruixin and Yongying Technology Smart Selection saw an increase in their shares. [24] - New Issuance and Continued Management: Among active equity products, Yongying Pioneer Semiconductor Smart Selection and Yongying High - end Equipment Smart Selection had the highest estimated net subscription amounts. The new - issue fund Guangfa Quality Selection had the largest issuance scale this quarter. [25] 3.3 Fund Company Dimension - Performance: Among active equity fund management companies with a management scale of over 10 billion yuan, Caitong Fund had the best average performance in Q4 2025, with an average return rate of 4.22%. Other companies with good performance included Western Lide, Yongying Fund, and Huashang Fund. [27] - Scale: E Fund remained the largest active equity management company in Q4 2025, although its scale decreased slightly compared to the previous quarter. Yongying Fund saw significant growth in its active equity scale in Q4 2025. [30] - Heavy - Holding Stock Allocation: Caitong Fund, the top - performing company in Q4, under - allocated non - ferrous metals and other industries and over - allocated electronics, communications, and other industries. Leading fund companies generally over - allocated non - ferrous metals and chemicals and under - allocated pharmaceutical biology. [32] - Industry Allocation of Leading Fund Companies: Leading active equity fund management companies' industry over - and under - allocations were mainly concentrated in several popular industries. For example, E Fund significantly over - allocated communications and food and beverages and significantly under - allocated power equipment and pharmaceuticals. [34] - Market Value and Valuation Style of Heavy - Holding Stocks: Companies with a relatively large - market - value style in their holdings included Ruiyuan, Morgan, and Huifutianfu; those with a relatively small - market - value style included Yongying, Dacheng, and Nuoyan; companies with relatively high PE in their holdings included Yongying, Huashang, and E Fund; and those with relatively low PE included Ruiyuan, Dacheng, and ABC Fortune. [37]