25Q4 主动权益基金季报分析：主动权益四季度加仓周期减持科技，永赢主动权益规模突破千亿

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - In Q4 2025, active equity funds generally focused on technology, consumption, and computing power. The scale of active equity funds decreased, while index funds increased slightly. The performance of active equity funds declined compared to the previous quarter. Funds increased their positions in cyclical sectors and reduced their positions in technology and pharmaceutical sectors [1][5][8]. - Caitong Fund had the best average performance among active equity fund management companies with a scale of over 10 billion yuan in Q4 2025. Other fund companies with good performance included Western Securities, Yongying Fund, and Huashang Fund [25]. 3. Summary According to the Table of Contents 3.1 Fund Four - Quarter Report Investment Outlook Keywords - Technology, consumption, and computing power were the key focuses of active equity fund managers in Q4. The trend keywords included "repair", "recovery", and "resilience"; industry - related keywords were "technology", "consumption", and "electronics"; theme keywords were "computing power", "robotics", and "new energy"; event - related keywords were "interest rate cuts", "exports", and "tariffs" [1][5]. 3.2 Performance and Scale Dimension - Scale Change: The scale of active equity funds decreased from approximately 4 trillion yuan in Q3 2025 to about 3.85 trillion yuan in Q4, a decline of 4.14%. Meanwhile, the scale of index funds increased slightly from 4.44 billion yuan to 4.54 billion yuan, a growth of 2.46%. In terms of fund companies, Yongying and Guojin had significant growth in active equity management scale, with Yongying's active equity scale exceeding 100 billion yuan [8][12]. - Performance: The performance of active equity funds in Q4 2025 declined significantly compared to the previous quarter. Approximately 42.8% of active equity funds achieved positive returns, with a median return of - 1.02%. Most funds' performance ranged from - 10% to 5%, and 192 funds achieved returns of over 10%. The top - performing funds in Q4 were mainly concentrated in industries such as military, non - ferrous metals, and communications [13][15]. - Position and Heavy - Holding Stock Allocation: The overall position of active equity funds decreased in Q4, with the average stock position dropping to 87.70% (-1.05%) and the Hong Kong stock position also significantly decreasing (-1.93%). The allocation ratio of heavy - holding stocks in Hong Kong stocks decreased, while the allocation ratios in CSI 300, CSI 500, and CSI 1000 increased [17][18]. - Large - Scale Funds: E Fund's Blue - Chip Select remained the largest active equity fund. Some large - scale funds' performance declined in Q4 2025, and their shares decreased, while some funds' shares continued to grow, such as Yongying Ruixin and Yongying Technology Smart Selection [22]. - New Issues and Continued Operations: In Q4 2025, Yongying Pioneer Semiconductor Smart Selection and Yongying High - end Equipment Smart Selection had the highest estimated net subscription amounts among active equity products. The new - issue product with the largest scale was GF Quality Selection, with a scale of 3.759 billion yuan. E Fund had the largest new - issue scale among fund companies, and Agricultural Bank of China had the largest new - issue scale among custodian banks [23][24]. 3.3 Fund Company Dimension - Performance: Caitong Fund had the best average performance of active equity funds in Q4 2025, with an average return of 4.22%. Other fund companies with good performance included Western Securities, Yongying Fund, and Huashang Fund. Fund companies with high performance differentiation included Yongying Fund and Baoying Fund, while those with low differentiation included Morgan Fund and Haitong Fund [25][26]. - Scale: E Fund remained the largest active equity management company, but its scale decreased in Q4 2025. Yongying Fund's active equity scale increased significantly in Q4 2025 [28]. - Heavy - Holding Stock Allocation: Caitong Fund under - allocated non - ferrous metals and over - allocated electronics and communications. Leading fund companies generally over - allocated non - ferrous metals and chemicals and under - allocated pharmaceutical and biological industries. Some fund companies also had significant over - or under - allocation in certain industries, such as CITIC Prudential Fund significantly over - allocating banks and Huashang Fund significantly over - allocating computers [30]. - Market Value and Valuation Style: Companies with relatively large - market - value holdings included Ruiyuan, Morgan, and Huatai - PineBridge; those with relatively small - market - value holdings included Yongying, Dacheng, and Nuoyuan; companies with relatively high PE holdings included Yongying, Huashang, and E Fund; those with relatively low PE holdings included Ruiyuan, Dacheng, and ABC - CA Fund [34].