2025Q4债基全梳理：固收+买债的逻辑-20260208

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - In Q4 2025, the fundraising scale of newly - issued bond funds declined, but the bond funds' performance was good, leading to an increase in the outstanding scale. The outstanding share of bond - type funds at the end of Q4 reached 9.31 trillion shares, an increase of nearly 200 billion shares compared to Q3 [3][20]. - For pure - bond funds, the heavy - position structure still focuses on interest - rate bonds, with credit bonds accounting for about 20%. In Q4, pure - bond funds mainly increased their positions in general credit bonds and Tier 2 capital and perpetual bonds, and significantly reduced their positions in general commercial financial bonds [4]. - For fixed - income + funds, interest - rate bonds are important underlying assets, accounting for 42% of the total market value of heavy - position bonds. The fixed - income + funds concentrated on policy - financial bonds and treasury bonds in terms of interest - rate bond positions, and preferred Tier 2 capital and perpetual bonds in terms of credit - bond positions [6]. 3. Summary According to the Table of Contents 3.1 Overview of Incremental Funds: Weak New - issue Performance, Growth in the Total Scale of Bond Funds - In Q4 2025, 101 new bond - type funds were issued, and the fundraising scale dropped to 58.6 billion yuan, showing a significant contraction compared with Q3 2025 and Q4 2024 [3][14]. - The bond - type fund index rose 0.51% quarter - on - quarter, and the long - term pure - bond funds outperformed short - term bond funds. The outstanding share of bond - type funds at the end of Q4 was 9.31 trillion shares, an increase of nearly 200 billion shares compared to Q3 [3][20]. 3.2 Heavy - position Bonds' Preference: Pure - bond Funds - The heavy - position structure of pure - bond funds still focused on interest - rate bonds in Q4 2025. The market value of heavy - position interest - rate bonds and credit bonds accounted for 71% and 20% of the total heavy - position market value respectively, with a marginal decline in heavy - position scale, decreasing by 5% and 3% quarter - on - quarter [4][25]. - In terms of varieties, pure - bond funds mainly increased their positions in general credit bonds and Tier 2 capital and perpetual bonds, and significantly reduced their positions in general commercial financial bonds. The heavy - position scale of general credit bonds and Tier 2 capital and perpetual bonds increased by 6.4 billion yuan and 5.4 billion yuan respectively, while the heavy - position scale of general commercial financial bonds decreased by over 30 billion yuan [4][28]. - Urban investment bonds: Pure - bond funds mainly increased their positions in urban investment bonds with an implicit rating of AA, with a quarter - on - quarter increase of 10.5 billion yuan. The proportion of holdings of varieties within 1 year remained stable at 43%. Zhejiang and Shandong were the provinces with the largest scale of urban investment bond allocation, and the increase in positions in Q4 was also mainly in these two provinces [4][35]. - Industrial bonds: The industries with the largest heavy - position scale of industrial bonds for pure - bond funds were public utilities and real estate. In Q4, pure - bond funds increased their positions in comprehensive, public utilities, and building decoration bonds. Due to the Vanke incident, pure - bond funds were relatively cautious about real - estate bonds. The heavy - position scale of industrial bonds was still concentrated within 3 years, with the proportion of holdings within 1 year dropping to 33%, and the proportion of holdings from 2 - 3 years increasing marginally [4][42]. - Financial bonds: The preference for Tier 2 capital and perpetual bonds by pure - bond funds recovered slightly in Q4. Pure - bond funds increased their positions in Tier 2 capital bonds by 7 billion yuan, continued to reduce their positions in bank perpetual bonds, and the heavy - position scale of Tier 2 capital and perpetual bonds accounted for 24% of credit bonds, with the proportion of Tier 2 capital and perpetual bonds of small and medium - sized banks decreasing [5][48]. 3.3 Heavy - position Bonds' Preference: Fixed - income + Funds - In Q4 2025, interest - rate bonds, credit bonds, and convertible bonds in the heavy - position assets of fixed - income + funds accounted for 42%, 28%, and 25% of the total market value of heavy - position bonds respectively. The growth rate of heavy - position interest - rate bonds slowed down from 34% in Q3 to 14%, but was still higher than that of credit bonds and convertible bonds [6][56]. - Interest - rate bonds: Fixed - income + funds concentrated on policy - financial bonds and treasury bonds. The heavy - position scale of policy - financial bonds reached 187.7 billion yuan, a quarter - on - quarter increase of 35.9 billion yuan, accounting for 61% of interest - rate bonds. The heavy - position scale of treasury bonds was 115.1 billion yuan, a quarter - on - quarter increase of 4.2 billion yuan, accounting for about 37% of interest - rate bonds. The main terms for treasury - bond allocation were within 3 years and over 7 years [6][59]. - Credit bonds: Fixed - income + funds preferred Tier 2 capital and perpetual bonds, which accounted for about half of the heavy - position scale of credit bonds. Compared with Q3, fixed - income + funds mainly increased their positions in Tier 2 capital and perpetual bonds and other financial bonds, and significantly reduced their positions in general credit bonds, especially urban investment bonds [7][66]. - Fixed - income + funds' preference for ultra - long - term credit bonds declined, with the heavy - position scale remaining at a low level of around 2.5 billion yuan in the past two quarters [7][70]. - For urban investment bonds, fixed - income + funds reduced their positions in urban investment bonds with implicit ratings of AA+ and AA, and the holding term was mainly within 3 years. The proportion of holdings of AA and below decreased to 57%. Zhejiang, Shandong, Jiangsu, and Sichuan were the provinces with the largest scale of urban investment bond allocation, and the scale of position reduction in Zhejiang, Shandong, and Xinjiang was relatively large [7][76]. - For industrial bonds, fixed - income + funds mainly allocated public - utility bonds, and their preference for medium - and long - term industrial bonds increased. The heavy - position scale of public - utility bonds was the largest, and the proportion of medium - and long - term holdings (4 - 5 years and over 5 years) increased, while the proportion of holdings within 2 years decreased [85]. - In Q4, fixed - income + funds repurchased Tier 2 capital and perpetual bonds, with a strengthened preference for 3 - 5 - year holdings. The proportion of Tier 2 capital and perpetual bonds of small and medium - sized banks in the total Tier 2 capital and perpetual bonds further dropped below 10%, and about half of the Tier 2 capital and perpetual bond holdings were concentrated in the 3 - 5 - year period [89].