HOW CAN WI-FI TECHNOLOGY ENABLE DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION ACROSS THE INDUSTRIAL IOT? Andrew Zignani, Senior Research Director INTRODUCTION Industrial enterprises are facing a growing number of economic, political, supply CONTENTS chain, regulatory, labor, and technology-related challenges. Recent years have Introduction ....................................1 been marked by various large-scale headwinds, including ongoing trade disputes, periodic lockdowns around the world, and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. A ...

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the industry Core Insights - FIFA has implemented temporary regulatory measures in response to the ongoing war in Ukraine, specifically through Annexe 7 to the Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (RSTP) [2][4] - The updated Annexe 7 (June 2024 edition) aims to provide legal clarity and support for players, coaches, and clubs affected by the war, extending the regulatory framework until 30 June 2025 [4][14] - The measures are designed to balance the interests of all stakeholders while preventing potential abuses of the regulations [5][9] Summary by Sections Scope of Application - Annexe 7 applies to international employment contracts between players or coaches and clubs affiliated with the Ukrainian Association of Football (UAF) or the Football Union of Russia (FUR) [7][8] - Certain limitations are in place to prevent abuses, such as not applying to contracts of players or coaches registered with UAF or FUR after 21 May 2023 [9][10] Performance of Football Contracts - Players or coaches can unilaterally suspend their contracts until 30 June 2025, provided they inform the club in writing by 1 July 2024 [12][15] - A valid suspension means players or coaches are considered "out of contract" and can sign with new clubs without facing penalties [19][20] Registration Matters - Players previously registered with UAF or FUR can register with a maximum of four clubs during one season and play for three different clubs [21][23] - FIFA may authorize immediate registration if an ITC request is rejected by UAF or FUR [22][23] Protection of Minors - Minors fleeing Ukraine due to the conflict are exempt from the general prohibition on international transfers before the age of 18 [26][27] Training Compensation - Training compensation is payable by new clubs for players registered for the first time as professionals before their 23rd birthday, under certain conditions [28][30] - No training compensation is owed by clubs not affiliated with UAF or FUR for players registered after leaving Ukraine or Russia [33] Further Limitations - Players whose contracts are suspended cannot be transferred against payment or sign new contracts with clubs affiliated to UAF or FUR during the suspension [34][35]

Explanatory Note on New Provisions in the Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players Regarding Female Players Minimum Labour Conditions for Female Players – 2024 Introduction As part of FIFA’s commitment to constantly adapt the regulatory framework to the reality of football and the transfer system, the FIFA Council agreed to mandate the FIFA administration to undertake a detailed assessment of the minimum labour conditions regarding pregnancy and maternity for profession ...

REGULATIONS on the Status and Transfer of Players JUNE 2024 Fédération Internationale de Football Association President: Gianni Infantino Secretary General: Mattias Grafström Address: FIFA FIFA-Strasse 20 P.O. Box 8044 Zurich Switzerland Telephone: +41 (0)43 222 7777 Internet: FIFA.com 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS DEFINITIONS 6 01. INTRODUCTORY PROVISION 12 1. Scope 13 02. STATUS OF PLAYERS 15 2. Status of players: amateur and professional players 16 3. Reacquisition of amateur status 16 4. Termination of activity 1 ...

VIEWPOINT ARTHUR LITTI 2024 FIBER 1 + 1 = 3: AN EQUATION FOR EFFECTIVE POST- MERGER INTEGRATION AUTHORS Realizing the true potential of fiber transactions in Europe & beyond Lars Riegel Gabriel Mohr Dr. Nejc Jakopin Nikolay Grozdanov Peter Freundel Tamas Lakos With tightening market conditions and ambitious competitive plans, the fiber to the home (FTTH) market seems poised for consolidation. In this Viewpoint, we argue that consolidation presents value creation potential for both players and investors — by ...

Chemicals 50 2024 The annual report on the most valuable and strongest Chemicals brands Supplementary analysis on Agriscience, Agri-nutrients and Paints brands May 2024 Contents About Brand Finance 3 Foreword 4 David Haigh, Chairman & CEO, Brand Finance ...

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly state an overall investment rating for the industry but highlights the significant contribution of brand strength to business value, suggesting a positive outlook for brands that effectively manage their brand equity [5][6]. Core Insights - The report emphasizes the importance of brand strength in asset management and sovereign wealth funds, indicating that brands with active investment strategies tend to have a higher proportion of brand value relative to assets under management (AuM) [6][7]. - BlackRock is identified as the world's most valuable asset management brand with a brand value of USD 7.0 billion, while JP Morgan Asset Management is recognized as the strongest brand with a Brand Strength Index (BSI) score of 87.4 [18][22]. - The report notes a trend of traditional asset managers entering private credit markets and sovereign wealth funds adopting characteristics of venture capital and hedge funds [7]. Summary by Sections Brand Value Ranking - BlackRock leads with a brand value of USD 7.0 billion, followed by JP Morgan Asset Management, Vanguard, and Blackstone [20][39]. - The top ten asset management brands include notable names such as Fidelity Investments, Goldman Sachs, and State Street Global Advisors, with varying brand values and BSI scores [33][39]. Strongest Brands - JP Morgan Asset Management is highlighted as the strongest asset management brand with a BSI score of 87.4, driven by high awareness and performance metrics [22][23]. - HSBC Asset Management is noted as the strongest non-US brand, while BNP Paribas Asset Management leads among non-US brands for brand value [24][26]. Sovereign Wealth Funds - The Public Investment Fund (PIF) is recognized as the most valuable sovereign wealth fund brand with a value of USD 1.1 billion, ranking second in brand strength [29][30]. - The Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) is noted for its strong brand presence, with a BSI score of 63.9, reflecting its long-standing investment history [30][29]. Market Trends - The report indicates a growing importance of alternative managers and sovereign wealth funds in the rankings, with firms like Blackstone and KKR making significant impacts [6][18]. - The blurring lines between traditional asset management and alternative investment strategies are emphasized, showcasing the evolving landscape of the industry [7].

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the industry. Core Insights - The report emphasizes the need for equitable electric vehicle (EV) charging solutions in lower-income multifamily housing to address transportation inequities and enhance access to e-mobility options [10][12][16]. Summary by Sections Executive Summary - The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and Inflation Reduction Act have increased funding for EV charging infrastructure, yet access remains concentrated in higher-income areas, leaving lower-income multifamily residents with significant gaps [10][11]. Project Background - The Multifamily Charging Accelerator Project aims to identify transportation needs and tailor charging solutions for lower-income multifamily housing, addressing disparities in charging access [16][19]. Charging Access Gaps - Approximately 80% of EV charging occurs at home, primarily in single-family homes, while over 40% of residents in major cities live in multifamily housing with limited charging options [17][18]. Key Considerations for Developing Equitable Charging Access - Community-driven solutions, cost burden considerations, electrical capacity, environmental justice, local transportation needs, and safety are critical factors in developing equitable charging access [20][21][22][23][24]. City Partnerships - The project collaborates with Atlanta, Phoenix, and Portland to implement charging solutions, focusing on underserved communities and leveraging local incentives [27][28][29]. Recommendations for Scaling Solutions - Recommendations include prioritizing community needs, fostering affordability, planning complementary mobility solutions, forming local partnerships, ensuring affordable charging, and developing an incremental change approach [12][13][14][15]. Outreach to Residents - Engagement with residents through surveys and community events is essential to understand their transportation needs and preferences for charging solutions [56][57]. Identifying Resident Needs - The report highlights the importance of understanding residents' transportation patterns and challenges to inform the development of effective charging solutions [58][59][61].

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the industry Core Insights - Micro-, small, and medium-size enterprises (MSMEs) are crucial to global economies, accounting for two-thirds of business employment in advanced economies and almost four-fifths in emerging economies, contributing to half of all value added [10][14] - Enhancing MSME productivity could yield significant economic value, with potential increases of 5% of GDP in advanced economies and 10% in emerging economies if MSMEs reach top-quartile productivity levels [10][11] - The productivity gap between MSMEs and large companies varies significantly across countries and sectors, with MSMEs in Kenya being only 6% as productive as large companies, while those in the UK are at 84% [46][54] Summary by Sections 1. Small Businesses Power the Economies of Today and Tomorrow - MSMEs create substantial value, contributing roughly half of global GDP, with shares exceeding 60% in countries like Portugal and Kenya, while being less than 40% in the US and India [25][27] - MSMEs are significant job creators, accounting for about 40% of all employment and 70% of employment in the business sector, with figures as high as 96% in Kenya [25][33] 2. Boosting MSME Productivity Could Yield Significant Value - The productivity of MSMEs is about half that of large companies, with significant variation across countries and sectors [45][46] - The productivity gap is larger in emerging economies compared to advanced ones, with microenterprises lagging further behind [46][47] 3. Looking Through a Microscope to Fill the Gaps - A detailed analysis reveals that MSME productivity varies widely across subsectors and countries, with specific subsectors driving the majority of the productivity gap [11][12] - Stakeholders must develop targeted productivity strategies that consider the unique challenges faced by MSMEs in different contexts [12] 4. Creating Value Through Networks and Interactions - MSMEs and large companies can benefit from improved productivity through collaborative networks, with evidence showing that productivity improvements in one can lead to gains in the other [11][12] 5. Seven Examples of Win-Win Domains - The report highlights specific sectors where MSMEs can thrive and contribute to overall economic growth, emphasizing the importance of tailored strategies for different industries [11] 6. Delivering a Win-Win Future - The future of MSMEs hinges on their ability to adapt and scale, with a focus on enhancing productivity and fostering collaboration with larger enterprises [11][12]

Market Performance - Year-to-date, MSCI China, Hang Seng, and CSI300 have delivered returns of 11%, 12%, and 6% respectively, outperforming S&P (11%), Topix (18%), MSCI ACWI (10%), and MSCI EM (8%) [18] - The trajectory of Chinese equity indices has experienced significant volatility, with severe outflows and index drawdowns in January before a recovery starting in February [30] Market Outlook - The current index levels are believed to have priced in improvements in macro stabilization, flows, and government policy pivots, leading to expectations of a range-bound market in the coming months [2][6] - The bull/bear scenarios for June 2025 indicate a wide range of performance outcomes for MSCI China, with a bear case showing a potential decline of 31% and a bull case showing an increase of 21% [7][50] Sector Preferences - Selective overweight positions are maintained in Materials and Consumer sectors, while a less cautious stance is adopted for Banks due to government initiatives aimed at stabilizing macro and property risks [8][21] - An underweight position is retained in Real Estate due to weak fundamentals [21] Investment Strategy - A recommendation is made to overweight A-shares within China allocations, expecting their outperformance against offshore markets to resume [3][20] - Key trades for the second half of 2024 include increasing A-shares in portfolios and focusing on thematic investing, particularly in SOE Reform Beneficiaries and China Going Global [4][28] Earnings Growth Forecast - Earnings growth for 2024 has been revised upward, reflecting better-than-expected macro stabilization trends, but is expected to remain below historical levels due to persistent deflationary pressures [19][35] - The forecast for MSCI China's earnings growth is projected to recover to 13% by 2026, following a challenging macro environment [41][61]