Public Investment Quality and Its Implications for Sovereign Risk and Debt Sustainability
Shi Jie Yin Hang· 2024-08-23 23:03
Public Disclosure Authorized Policy Research Working Paper 10877 Public Investment Quality and Its Implications for Sovereign Risk and Debt Sustainability Amat Adarov Ugo Panizza Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Development Economics Prospects Group August 2024 Policy Research Working Paper 10877 Abstract This paper introduces a novel index to measure public investment quality, utilizing the World Bank's investment project performance data from 120 count ...
Making Waves – World Bank Group Support for the Blue Economy, 2012-2023 – An Independent Evaluation
Shi Jie Yin Hang· 2024-08-23 23:03
Public Disclosure Authorized Making Waves Public Disclosure Authorized World Bank Support for the Blue Economy, 2012–23 An Independent Evaluation Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized © 2024 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org ATTRIBUTION Please cite the report as: World Bank. 2024. Making Waves: World Bank Support for the Blue Economy, 2012–23. Independent Evaluat ...
Impact of Out-of-pocket Health Payments on Poverty and Alignment of Public and External Health Financing in Guinea
Shi Jie Yin Hang· 2024-08-23 23:03
Public Disclosure Authorized 1 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Impact of out-of-pocket health payments on poverty and alignment of public and external health financing in Guinea Health, Nutrition, and Population Global Practice Public Disclosure Authorized June 2024 © 2024 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org This work is a product of the staff of The World Ban ...
Measuring Poverty in Tanzania
Shi Jie Yin Hang· 2024-08-22 23:08
Policy Research Working Paper 10871 Measuring Poverty in Tanzania Comparison of Diary and Recall Approaches to Food Consumption Data Collection Akuffo Amankwah Darcey Jeanne Genou Johnson Josephine Ofori Adofo Maryam Gul Amparo Palacios-Lopez Development Economics Development Data Group August 2024 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized A verified reproducibility package for this paper is available at http://reproducibility.worldbank.org, click here for direct access. Public Disclosure Au ...
Who on Earth Is Using Generative AI ?
Shi Jie Yin Hang· 2024-08-22 23:03
Policy Research Working Paper 10870 Who on Earth Is Using Generative AI? Yan Liu He Wang Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Digital Development Global Practice August 2024 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Policy Research Working Paper 10870 Abstract Leveraging unconventional data, including website traffic data and Google Trends, this paper unveils the real-time usage patterns of generative artificial intelligence tools by individuals across countries. The pap ...
Do Men Really Have Greater Socio-Emotional Skills Than Women? Evidence from Tanzanian Youth
Shi Jie Yin Hang· 2024-08-22 23:03
Investment Rating - The report does not provide a specific investment rating for the industry. Core Insights - The study investigates socio-emotional skills (SES) among Tanzanian youth, revealing that men self-report higher SES than women, but behavioral measures show minimal gender gaps, suggesting men's overestimation of their skills rather than women's underestimation [4][10][36]. Summary by Sections Introduction - The demand for socio-emotional skills in the labor market is increasing, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. SES are recognized as foundational skills alongside literacy and numeracy, with potential high economic returns [8][9]. Methodology - The study utilizes a sample of over 4,000 youth not in education, employment, or training (NEET) in urban Tanzania, employing both self-reported and behavioral measures of 14 SES [10][16]. Results - Men score higher than women on all 12 positively-worded self-reported SES measures, with a gender gap of 0.20 standard deviations. However, behavioral measures show only small gender gaps for a few skills, indicating that self-reported measures may be influenced by social desirability bias [10][36][39]. - The gap between self-reported and behavioral measures is larger among men, suggesting that men's overestimation of their skills is linked to gendered beliefs about abilities [10][40]. Discussion - The findings contribute to the understanding of gender gaps in SES, indicating that apparent male advantages in self-reported skills may not reflect actual skill differences. The study emphasizes the importance of using behavioral measures to assess SES accurately [11][12][14]. - The report highlights the need for interventions that address beliefs about abilities and improve both men's and women's labor market outcomes [14][46].
Rate Cycles
Shi Jie Yin Hang· 2024-08-22 23:03
Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Policy Research Working Paper 10876 Rate Cycles Kristin Forbes Jongrim Ha M. Ayhan Kose Public Disclosure Authorized Development Economics Prospects Group August 2024 Policy Research Working Paper 10876 Abstract This paper analyzes cycles in policy interest rates in 24 advanced economies over 1970–2024, combining a new application of business cycle methodology with rich time-series decompositions of the shocks driving rat ...
Private Management of African Protected Areas Improves Wildlife and Tourism Outcomes but With Security Concerns in Conflict Regions
Shi Jie Yin Hang· 2024-08-22 23:03
Public Disclosure Authorized Policy Research Working Paper 10874 Private Management of African Protected Areas Improves Wildlife and Tourism Outcomes but With Security Concerns in Conflict Regions Sean Denny Gabriel Englander Patrick Hunnicutt Development Economics Development Research Group August 2024 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized A verified reproducibility package for this paper is available at http://reproducibility.worldbank.org, click here for direct access. Public Disclosu ...
Measuring Social Sustainability
Shi Jie Yin Hang· 2024-08-22 23:03
Investment Rating - The report does not provide a specific investment rating for the industry Core Insights - The report emphasizes the growing importance of social sustainability and the need for a consensus on its measurement to effectively monitor progress towards sustainable development goals [4][7] - It introduces the Social Sustainability Index, which measures multidimensional social gaps across four dimensions: inclusion, resilience, social cohesion, and process legitimacy, using 16 indicators [4][8] - The findings indicate that approximately two-thirds of the population in Peru and South Africa experience overlapping social gaps, with intensity rates of 47% and 53% respectively, highlighting significant social fragility [4][9] Summary by Sections Introduction - The report discusses the increasing global attention on social sustainability due to rising poverty and inequality exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic [7] - It highlights the lack of an empirical measure for social sustainability, which hampers effective policy design and monitoring [7][8] Conceptual and Measurement Framework - The report outlines a conceptual framework for social sustainability that includes social cohesion, inclusion, resilience, and process legitimacy [15][19] - It critiques existing literature for lacking a consensus on measurement and proposes a comprehensive approach to assess social sustainability across multiple dimensions [19][20] Methodology - The report details a new methodology based on the Counting Approach to measure social sustainability multidimensionally, identifying individuals experiencing multiple social gaps [28][29] - It describes the process of aggregating individual social gap data into a synthetic index, the Social Sustainability Index (SSI), which can be disaggregated by population group [31][32] Application - The report applies the proposed Social Sustainability Index in Peru and South Africa, demonstrating its utility in identifying vulnerable populations and the dimensions driving social sustainability gaps [4][9][34] - It emphasizes the importance of accountability and inclusion in policy design to address the identified social gaps [4][9]
Tech 100 2024
Brand Finance· 2024-08-22 00:43
Investment Rating - The report provides a comprehensive analysis of the most valuable technology brands, with a focus on brand value growth and strength ratings, indicating a positive outlook for the technology sector in 2024 [20][23][29]. Core Insights - Apple has reclaimed the title of the most valuable tech brand in 2024, with a brand value increase of 74% to USD 516.6 billion, supported by strong brand equity and premium pricing strategies [20][23]. - NVIDIA's brand value surged by 163% to USD 44.5 billion, making it the fastest-growing tech brand, driven by high demand for AI-related hardware [20][26]. - Microsoft also saw significant growth, with its brand value rising by 78% to USD 340.4 billion, bolstered by its AI innovations and collaboration with OpenAI [20][27]. - Weixin/WeChat, YouTube, and Google received AAA+ brand strength ratings, highlighting their strong market positions [20][25]. Ranking Analysis - The top three most valuable technology brands in 2024 are Apple (USD 516.6 billion), Microsoft (USD 340.4 billion), and Google (USD 333.4 billion), reflecting substantial year-on-year growth [22][32]. - The report ranks the top 10 technology brands, with notable increases in brand value for TikTok (up 28.2% to USD 84.2 billion) and Accenture (up 2% to USD 40.5 billion) [22][32]. - The report also highlights the importance of sustainability perceptions, with Apple leading in sustainability perceptions value at USD 33.3 billion, while Microsoft has the highest positive gap value of USD 3.2 billion [28][29]. Brand Strength Index - The Brand Strength Index (BSI) scores for the top brands indicate strong market recognition, with Apple achieving a score of 86.5, Microsoft at 86.2, and Weixin/WeChat at 94.3, showcasing their competitive advantages [23][25][29]. - The report emphasizes the role of brand strength in driving customer loyalty and market differentiation, which are critical for sustained growth in the technology sector [10][20]. Sustainability Insights - The report includes a Sustainability Perceptions Index, indicating that sustainability drives 7% of customer consideration in the technology sector, highlighting the growing importance of corporate responsibility [28][29]. - Apple's sustainability efforts have been recognized, although the report notes the challenges the company faces regarding public perception and actual performance [28][29]. Conclusion - Overall, the report indicates a robust growth trajectory for leading technology brands, driven by innovation, strong brand equity, and increasing consumer focus on sustainability [20][27][29].