Workflow
高盛和JP Morgan对中芯国际的两种截然不同的结论
傅里叶的猫·2025-05-13 12:04

Core Viewpoint - Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan have released contrasting analyses on SMIC, highlighting differing perspectives on the company's future performance and market conditions [1]. Group 1: Goldman Sachs Analysis - Goldman Sachs maintains a positive outlook on SMIC, citing strong customer demand and the benefits of local production trends and diversified partnerships [2][4]. - The management of SMIC is optimistic about maintaining high capacity utilization rates through 2025, with a stable capital expenditure plan to support expansion [2][3]. - Despite short-term pressures on average selling prices (ASP) and rising depreciation costs, SMIC's long-term gross margin target remains at 20%, supported by operational efficiency and product upgrades [3][4]. Group 2: JP Morgan Analysis - JP Morgan reports that SMIC's first-quarter revenue fell short of market expectations by 5%, primarily due to ASP declines caused by factory yield fluctuations [5][6]. - The second-quarter revenue guidance indicates a projected decline of 4-6%, reflecting ongoing ASP weakness and cautious outlook on technology demand due to tariff concerns [6][7]. - JP Morgan has lowered its revenue growth expectations for 2025 to 10-11%, down from 16%, due to a weak outlook for the second half of the year [6][7]. Group 3: Comparative Insights - Both firms predict similar gross margin ranges for SMIC, with Goldman Sachs focusing on industry recovery and domestic substitution benefits, while JP Morgan is more sensitive to supply-demand imbalances and cost pressures [8].