【有本好书送给你】华为鸿蒙背后，真实的破晓之路

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the development and strategic decisions surrounding Huawei's HarmonyOS, particularly the debate between adopting a dual-framework or a single-framework approach in response to U.S. sanctions and the need for an independent operating system [9][34]. Group 1: Huawei's Challenges and Responses - In 2020, Huawei faced severe sanctions from the U.S., which restricted its access to essential hardware and software, leading to a critical need for an independent operating system [11][28]. - The sanctions forced Huawei to consider alternatives to Android, with internal discussions focusing on whether to develop a dual-framework system that retains compatibility with Android or to pursue a completely independent single-framework system [12][15][20]. Group 2: Dual-Framework vs. Single-Framework Debate - The dual-framework approach allows for compatibility with Android, which many within Huawei believe is necessary for maintaining user experience and market presence [13][17]. - Conversely, proponents of the single-framework argue that true independence and innovation can only be achieved by completely separating from Android, despite the significant investment and risk involved [14][18][20]. Group 3: Strategic Decisions and Developments - By mid-2021, Huawei's management recognized the urgency of developing a single-framework system, leading to a restructuring of teams to focus on this goal [30][31]. - The decision to pursue a single-framework system was solidified with a three-step strategy aimed at creating a robust architecture, enhancing user experience, and fostering a thriving ecosystem [31][32]. Group 4: Market Impact and Future Outlook - The launch of HarmonyOS 2.0 in June 2021 was met with positive reception, with significant upgrades occurring across devices, indicating a successful transition towards Huawei's independent operating system [25][26]. - Despite the challenges, Huawei's commitment to developing HarmonyOS reflects a broader strategy to establish a self-sufficient technological ecosystem in the face of geopolitical pressures [21][29].