白宫重拳打击哈佛，国际生突遭集体驱逐

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant impact of the Trump administration's decision to revoke Harvard University's certification for the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP), effectively barring the university from enrolling international students, which could have severe financial and academic repercussions for both Harvard and the broader U.S. higher education system [3][4][5]. Group 1: Impact on Harvard University - The revocation of SEVP certification means Harvard cannot enroll any new international students for the 2025-2026 academic year, affecting approximately 6,800 current international students who make up about 27% of the total student body [5][7]. - The financial implications are significant, as international students typically pay higher tuition fees, with Harvard's tuition for the upcoming academic year set at $59,320, and total costs potentially reaching $87,000 [7][10]. - Harvard's response includes a legal challenge against the Trump administration, asserting that the actions are illegal and detrimental to the university's mission and community [4][8]. Group 2: Broader Context of U.S. Higher Education - The article highlights a growing conflict between the Trump administration and elite U.S. universities, with Harvard being a focal point due to its historical significance and financial resources [5][10]. - The administration's actions are part of a broader strategy to reshape U.S. higher education, targeting perceived liberal biases in academic institutions and attempting to reduce federal funding to those that do not align with conservative values [13][16]. - The article notes that over 1.1 million international students were enrolled in U.S. universities for the 2023-2024 academic year, with a significant portion from India and China, indicating the importance of international students to the U.S. education system [8]. Group 3: Legal and Political Ramifications - The Trump administration's actions have led to multiple lawsuits, including one from Harvard against the government, and a broader legal context where international students have faced visa terminations and identity issues [11][18]. - The article mentions that the administration's approach has been criticized for exacerbating internal divisions within the U.S. and for failing to address the underlying issues of anti-Semitism and campus safety [10][19]. - The ongoing legal battles and political maneuvers reflect a significant shift in the landscape of U.S. higher education, with potential long-term consequences for academic freedom and international collaboration [17][19].