哈佛大学和毕业生代表，都不知道自己错在哪里

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the contrasting perceptions of a Chinese graduate, Jiang, who delivered a speech at Harvard University, highlighting the divide between elite institutions and the general public's sentiments regarding fairness and opportunity in society [2][10][13]. Group 1: Jiang's Speech and Public Reaction - Jiang's speech at Harvard was met with both applause and criticism, reflecting a shift in public sentiment towards elite achievements and the perceived unfairness of opportunities [2][3][4]. - The public's skepticism towards Jiang's success stems from her background, as her father holds a prominent position in a biodiversity organization, leading to questions about the role of privilege in her achievements [3][5][10]. - Despite Jiang's efforts to clarify her independence from her father's influence, the public remains unconvinced, indicating a broader distrust of elite narratives [5][6][10]. Group 2: Harvard's Globalization Stance - Harvard's choice to feature Jiang in its graduation ceremony symbolizes the institution's commitment to globalization, which contrasts with the sentiments of many Americans who prioritize national interests [9][10]. - The article argues that while Harvard's ideals may be noble, they fail to address the real concerns of the public, who are more focused on immediate economic and social issues rather than abstract global principles [10][11][14]. - The disconnect between elite institutions like Harvard and the general populace is highlighted, suggesting that the elite are out of touch with the struggles faced by ordinary people [11][13][14]. Group 3: Comparison with Other Institutions - The article contrasts Jiang's speech with that of Andrew Yang, a graduate from Columbia University, who focused on relatable themes of struggle and community, making his message more accessible to the public [16][17]. - Yang's approach is presented as a more genuine representation of the collective human experience, in contrast to Jiang's perceived elitism and detachment [16][17].