唐劲草：发债募资，能治本吗？

Group 1 - The current venture capital industry in China faces significant challenges in the entire "fundraising, investment, management, and exit" chain, particularly in terms of insufficient funding supply and ineffective exit mechanisms, which severely restrict the industry's ability to serve the real economy and technological innovation [1] - The introduction of a "technology board" in the bond market aims to support experienced private equity and venture capital firms in issuing long-term technology innovation bonds, thereby attracting more funds for early, small, long-term, and hard technology investments [1][2] - The People's Bank of China plans to create risk-sharing tools for technology innovation bonds, providing low-cost refinancing funds to support private equity firms in issuing low-cost, long-term bonds, which will help reduce their reliance on traditional equity financing [1][2] Group 2 - The introduction of technology bonds increases financial costs and repayment pressure for venture capital firms, which traditionally operate on a "light asset" model, relying on management fees and performance rewards rather than their own capital [2] - The root cause of the fundraising difficulties in the venture capital industry lies in the lack of long-term stable funding supply, with technology bonds being a new fundraising avenue, but the industry also urgently needs market-oriented long-term funds like social security and insurance funds [2][3] Group 3 - Attracting long-term funds into the venture capital sector can create a virtuous cycle of "capital input - project cultivation - value realization - capital circulation," fundamentally addressing the fundraising challenges and promoting technological innovation and industrial upgrading [3] - The key to solving the venture capital investment dilemma and fostering innovation momentum is to promote the entry of long-term funds from social security and insurance into venture capital funds, establishing a market-oriented, long-term capital supply mechanism [3] Group 4 - Recommendations for optimizing long-term fund management include a three-tiered collaborative model involving central government guidance, local platform implementation, and professional institutional operation, aiming to create a robust ecosystem for technology innovation funds [4] - The establishment of a local mother fund ecosystem that coordinates provincial, municipal, and county levels, ensuring efficient fund operation and preventing idle capital [5] Group 5 - A scientific classification and evaluation system for venture capital institutions should be established to enhance the effectiveness of market-oriented operations, focusing resources on high-quality entities [6] - A dynamic management mechanism should be implemented to monitor and adjust the classification of institutions based on performance and compliance, ensuring that support resources are directed towards professional and efficient market-oriented sub-funds [7] Group 6 - To address the exit challenges in venture capital, a standardized secondary market for private equity should be developed, expanding participation from long-term funds and enhancing market liquidity and transaction efficiency [8] - The establishment of a complete ecosystem involving central and local government collaboration, market-oriented fund operation, and efficient exit mechanisms is essential for providing stable capital support for technological innovation strategies [8]