TrendForce集邦·2025-06-05 08:30Core Insights - OLED technology is expanding its market share due to advantages like self-emission, high contrast, and lightweight design, primarily in small-sized applications such as smartphones. However, large-sized market penetration is slow due to cost and capacity constraints [1] - The mid-size market, including monitors, laptops, tablets, and automotive displays, is experiencing renewed competition as consumers seek high-end display effects [1] - TrendForce forecasts that OLED display shipments will grow by 80.6% annually by 2025, with overall market penetration reaching 2%, and potentially challenging 5% by 2028 [1] Group 1: Market Dynamics - TCL Huaxing is set to mass-produce medical-grade printed OLED displays, while Visionox is expected to introduce ViP technology in its new production line [2] - Printed OLED technology aims to overcome limitations of FMM and vacuum environments, enhancing material usage efficiency and reducing equipment investment costs by approximately 25% compared to similar vapor-deposited products [2] - Despite challenges in yield, pixel density, and reliability, printed OLED panels have achieved a resolution of 326 PPI, meeting the needs of laptops and monitors [2] Group 2: Technological Innovations - TCL Huaxing is balancing technological innovation and mass production by supplying high-end smartphones and flagship laptops with FMM OLED while gradually introducing printed OLED for medical and gaming displays [2] - By the end of 2024, TCL Huaxing will begin small-scale production of 21.6-inch medical printed OLED displays, marking a significant step into commercial application [2] - Visionox is actively promoting its proprietary ViP technology, which utilizes lithography to achieve pixel graphics, freeing itself from FMM's size and resolution constraints [3] Group 3: Comparative Analysis - A comparison of OLED technologies shows that printed OLED has lower equipment investment costs and high material usage efficiency, while FMM OLED is more established but has higher costs [4] - The pixel density of ViP OLED can reach 1700-2000 PPI, significantly higher than the approximately 326 PPI of printed OLED, indicating a trade-off between technology maturity and performance [4] - The market is expected to see a shift towards more flexible and cost-effective OLED solutions as non-vapor deposition technologies gain traction [3][4]