孙正义被告了

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the legal battle between SoftBank and Credit Suisse over a $440 million loss stemming from the bankruptcy of Greensill Capital, emphasizing the risks associated with high-stakes investments in unicorn companies [1][10]. Group 1: Background of the Dispute - Greensill Capital, founded in 2011, specialized in supply chain finance, attracting significant investments from SoftBank and Credit Suisse, with SoftBank investing approximately $1.5 billion [5][6]. - The company initially thrived, but the COVID-19 pandemic severely impacted its operations, leading to its bankruptcy in 2021 [6][7]. - The bankruptcy resulted in substantial losses for both SoftBank and Credit Suisse, with the latter facing additional scandals that contributed to its downfall [7][8]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - Following the merger of Credit Suisse and UBS, Credit Suisse filed a lawsuit against SoftBank for $440 million, claiming that SoftBank's actions led to the loss of funds lent to the construction company Katerra [10][11]. - The lawsuit centers around the claim that SoftBank prioritized its own investment value over the repayment obligations to Credit Suisse, leading to the loss of the funds [11][12]. - The ongoing court proceedings have revealed conflicting narratives, with Greensill's founder stating he was forced to accept SoftBank's restructuring plan [12]. Group 3: Broader Implications for the Investment Landscape - The article reflects on the broader trend of investment firms facing significant losses from high-profile unicorn failures, with examples like Temasek's losses from FTX and eFishery [15][16]. - It underscores a shift in investor sentiment towards more cautious and pragmatic approaches, as many once-prominent unicorns struggle to secure further funding [16][17].