Workflow
深度 | 发电量为什么和工业增加值“脱节”?——中观看实体之五【陈兴团队•财通宏观】
陈兴宏观研究·2025-06-17 11:55

Core Viewpoint - The growth rate of electricity generation has consistently lagged behind the growth rate of industrial added value this year, indicating a potential structural issue rather than short-term fluctuations [1][3][21] Group 1: Reasons for Divergence - The first discrepancy in metrics arises from the definition of electricity generation, which refers to the output of large-scale industrial power generation enterprises, excluding smaller enterprises that contribute less than 8% to total electricity consumption [4][8] - The second discrepancy is that while electricity generation data is not comprehensive, it aligns with electricity consumption data, which does not differentiate between large and small enterprises, whereas the industrial added value growth rate is based solely on large enterprises [8][12] - The slowdown in the number of large industrial enterprises and the increase in industrial added value suggest that larger companies are performing well, while smaller companies are dragging down overall growth [8][9] Group 2: Industry Analysis - Significant divergence in electricity consumption and industrial added value growth is observed in industries such as electrical machinery, chemicals, non-metallic minerals, and general equipment, which are currently facing low capacity utilization rates [14][15][17] - The low capacity utilization indicates potential overcapacity, leading to a slowdown in electricity consumption growth, while efficient enterprises are likely to thrive by adopting advanced technologies and management practices [15][19] - Data from listed companies show that larger firms in the aforementioned industries are performing better than smaller firms, highlighting a trend of market-driven capacity elimination [19][21] Group 3: Future Outlook - The divergence between electricity generation growth and industrial added value growth is expected to persist, primarily due to weak demand and overcapacity in the industry, reminiscent of the supply-side structural reform period in 2015 [21]