重磅！从侵权风波到2025重启，「新财富最佳分析师评选」若干问题正面回应

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the legal protection and unique status of Shenzhen New Fortune Multimedia Co., Ltd. as the sole organizer of the "New Fortune Best Analyst Selection," highlighting its established brand and the integrity of its evaluation process [1][5][6]. Group 1: Qualification and Brand Ownership - Shenzhen New Fortune Multimedia Co., Ltd. is recognized as a qualified organizer under the regulations set by the China Securities Association [1]. - The company holds clear ownership of trademarks and copyrights related to the "New Fortune" brand and its associated awards, which are considered core assets [1]. - The official communication channels for the "New Fortune Best Analyst Selection" are consistently maintained through the New Fortune website and official WeChat account [5]. Group 2: Legal Violations and Disputes - A certain newspaper's attempt to organize a similar analyst selection constitutes a breach of contract and infringement, as it violates the independence and exclusivity agreed upon in a previous equity transaction [8][9]. - The newspaper's actions, including unauthorized use of original selection data and misleading communications, have led to claims of damages against them [9]. - There were instances of former employees taking registration data to the competing selection, further complicating the situation [10]. Group 3: Selection Process and Transparency - The upcoming "22nd New Fortune Best Analyst Selection" will utilize algorithms to ensure transparency and fairness, reducing human interference in the evaluation process [14]. - The selection process will continue to uphold established rules while enhancing transparency by disclosing voting weights and shortening the result announcement period [14]. - The "New Fortune Best Analyst Selection" has seen increased participation, with over 1,000 buy-side institutions registered, maintaining its authoritative status in the industry [22]. Group 4: Awards and Recognition - The "New Fortune Best Analyst Selection" features exclusive awards such as "Platinum Analyst," "Diamond Analyst," and "Double Diamond Analyst," based on historical performance data [17]. - The criteria for these awards are clearly defined, rewarding analysts for their consistent top performance over multiple years [17]. Group 5: Respect for Institutional Autonomy - The company advocates for the autonomy of research institutions in choosing which selections to participate in, opposing any form of coercion or pressure [19]. - It emphasizes that institutions have the right to engage in multiple evaluations without facing repercussions from the "New Fortune" selection [19]. Group 6: Timeline of Events - The timeline of events surrounding the "22nd New Fortune Best Analyst Selection" and the competing selection by the newspaper illustrates a series of coordinated actions that led to confusion among participants [24][25][26]. - The sudden emergence of the newspaper's selection and the subsequent issues with voting processes have resulted in reputational damage for the "New Fortune" brand [29][30].