全球经济治理新范式|新刊亮相

Core Viewpoint - The global economic governance paradigm is undergoing profound evolution, characterized by the shift from a single power structure to a more collaborative and shared governance model, emphasizing multilateral participation and institutional restructuring [6][10]. Group 1: Global Economic Governance Changes - The current global economic governance is influenced by geopolitical conflicts, rising protectionism, and the acceleration of digital and green transformations, leading to a weakening of global growth momentum [6][12]. - The restructuring of financial order is a significant manifestation of adjustments in global governance, highlighting the need for a diversified sovereign currency coexistence and orderly competition [7][12]. - The role of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and Special Drawing Rights (SDR) is evolving from crisis response to regular operation, enhancing their integration into trade, financing, and reserve systems [7][21]. Group 2: China's Role in Global Governance - China is transitioning from a rule-taker to a rule-maker in global economic governance, promoting high-level opening-up and aligning with international high-standard trade rules [8][12]. - The country is developing a comprehensive policy framework around digital payments, green finance, and data regulation, aiming to create replicable international governance solutions [8][12]. - China's commitment to multilateralism and shared development is evident in its efforts to enhance institutional compatibility and participation depth within the global governance system [7][8]. Group 3: Future Governance Paradigms - The future of global economic governance remains undefined, with key variables including the restructuring of multilateral mechanisms, the rule-based advancement of technological governance, and the diversification of the international monetary system [8][10]. - Balancing national sovereignty with global cooperation, efficiency with fairness, and risk prevention with innovation will be crucial for the effectiveness and sustainability of future governance frameworks [8][12].