协同办公陷入「智能混战」，飞书试图以「成熟度等级」破局

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges and opportunities in the AI office product market, emphasizing the need for a clear standard to evaluate the maturity of AI applications, as exemplified by Feishu's "AI Application Maturity Model" [6][10]. Group 1: AI Market Dynamics - The AI wave has created a mix of excitement and anxiety among companies, leading to confusion in selecting intelligent office products [2][3]. - Many companies are overwhelmed by the variety of AI products available, resulting in hasty purchases that often do not meet expectations [3][4]. - The lack of clear standards has led to chaotic competition in the AI product market, making it difficult for users to discern quality [3][4]. Group 2: Feishu's AI Application Maturity Model - Feishu introduced the "AI Application Maturity Model," categorizing AI applications into four levels: M1 (concept validation), M2 (early trial), M3 (mature application), and M4 (fully mature) [6][7]. - This model aims to provide a reference standard for users to assess the intelligence level of products, addressing the confusion in the AI To B application market [7][10]. Group 3: Characteristics of "True Intelligent" Products - Feishu defines a "true intelligent" product as one that effectively combines standards, technology, and performance to enhance productivity [19]. - The "Knowledge Q&A" feature is rated at M3 maturity, indicating it is suitable for large-scale use, while the "AI Meeting" feature has reached M4 maturity, showcasing its comprehensive application [12][13]. - Performance improvements, such as increased data capacity and faster loading times, are crucial for the effectiveness of intelligent applications [15][16]. Group 4: Conclusion - The ultimate goal of intelligent products is to enhance efficiency, and the To B intelligent office industry must integrate standards, technology, and performance to alleviate selection anxiety for enterprises [19].