当你看过人性的复杂，就不会轻言善恶

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the complexity of human nature and the gray areas between morality and legality, emphasizing that understanding these nuances can lead to a more profound comprehension of justice and human behavior [10][12][14]. Group 1: Human Nature and Crime - The article highlights that individuals who commit crimes may not always be purely evil, as circumstances can lead to actions that are morally ambiguous [20][21]. - It presents the case of 崔英杰, a man who committed a crime under extreme duress, raising questions about empathy and the societal pressures that can lead to criminal behavior [22][32]. - The narrative of 陆勇, who resorted to illegal actions to obtain life-saving medication, illustrates the conflict between legality and moral justification in desperate situations [34][48]. Group 2: Legal Perspectives - The article emphasizes that legal judgments often reflect societal values and the complexities of individual circumstances, as seen in the cases discussed [49][51]. - It argues that laws are not always rigid and can have flexible interpretations based on human experiences and motivations [50][52]. - The discussion of the American elevator case reveals how public perception and biases can influence the understanding of legal matters, highlighting the need for a nuanced approach to justice [58][76]. Group 3: Moral Boundaries - The article stresses the importance of maintaining moral integrity and not crossing ethical lines, even in challenging situations [111][116]. - It suggests that individuals should strive to understand the complexities of human behavior while upholding their own moral standards [117][122]. - The narrative encourages a balanced perspective, advocating for empathy without compromising one's ethical principles [120][121].