量化VS主观，近三年业绩孰强？百亿量化领跑！幻方量化排名居前，东方港湾不甘示弱！

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the performance comparison between quantitative and subjective private equity funds over the past three years, highlighting that the market environment favors quantitative strategies due to significant volatility and structural characteristics in the A-share market [2][3]. Performance Overview - As of June 2025, there are 83 quantitative private equity firms and 163 subjective private equity firms with three or more products showing performance data over the past three years [2]. - The median return for quantitative private equity is higher than that of subjective private equity, while the average return for subjective private equity is higher than that of quantitative private equity [2]. Scale Comparison - In the 100 billion and above scale group, quantitative private equity outperformed subjective private equity, with the top performer being Abama Investment [4][6]. - In the 20-50 billion scale group, subjective private equity showed better overall returns compared to other scale groups [3][4]. Top Performers - The top ten quantitative private equity firms in the 100 billion and above scale include Abama Investment, Tianyan Capital, and Maoyuan Quantitative, with the performance threshold exceeding ***% [4][6]. - The top five subjective private equity firms in the same scale include Junzhijian Investment and Oriental Harbor, with significant contributions from heavy investments in stocks like Nvidia [7][10]. 10-100 Billion Scale - In the 10-100 billion scale group, subjective private equity firms outperformed quantitative firms, with the top five being Guangzhou Shouzheng Yongqi and Oak Asset Management [10][12]. Below 10 Billion Scale - In the below 10 billion scale group, subjective private equity firms also led in performance, with the top five including Mufeng Investment and Huacheng Private Equity [17][20].