Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) and emphasizes the importance of intermediate reasoning steps in enhancing model confidence and accuracy in problem-solving [5][10][34]. Group 1: Importance of Reasoning in LLMs - Reasoning in LLMs refers to the intermediate thought processes that occur before arriving at a final answer, which can significantly improve the model's ability to solve complex problems [5][11]. - Introducing a chain of thought (CoT) allows LLMs to tackle inherently serial problems without needing to expand the model size, thus bridging the gap between Transformers and Turing machines [12][13]. - The presence of reasoning steps increases the accuracy and reliability of answers, reducing the likelihood of random guessing [14][17]. Group 2: Enhancing Model Confidence - Answers derived from reasoning processes lead to greater confidence in the model's outputs, as they are based on logical deductions rather than mere guesses [19][20]. - Denny Zhou highlights that pre-trained models possess reasoning capabilities even without fine-tuning, although these outputs may not be prioritized in greedy decoding [21][24]. Group 3: Methods to Improve Reasoning - The CoT-decoding method selects reasoning paths from top-k alternatives, enhancing performance on reasoning tasks and approaching the effectiveness of instruction-tuned models [26]. - Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) involves training models on human-written step-by-step problems, but it may lack generalization across new scenarios [27][28]. - Reinforcement learning fine-tuning has emerged as a powerful method for eliciting reasoning, focusing on generating longer responses and improving model performance through iterative training [31]. Group 4: Future Directions - Denny Zhou identifies key areas for future breakthroughs, including addressing tasks with non-unique verifiable answers and developing practical applications beyond benchmark testing [35][40].
斯坦福大模型推理课免费了,谷歌推理团队创始人主讲