懂车帝的测试可信吗？

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent testing of advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) conducted by Dongche Di, highlighting both successful and unsuccessful performances across various vehicle models in simulated accident scenarios. Group 1: Testing Overview - The testing involved 15 ADAS-related subjects and nearly 40 vehicle models from major brands like Xiaomi and Tesla, using real accident scenarios for simulation [8]. - The results showed that only 3 out of 15 urban scenarios had a passing rate above 50%, indicating overall poor performance in high-difficulty situations [21]. Group 2: Testing Methodology and Concerns - There were criticisms regarding the use of fabric vehicles instead of real cars for testing, with the rationale being that laser radar is more sensitive to metal than fabric [11][13]. - The article emphasizes the importance of establishing credible testing standards, suggesting that collaboration with authoritative institutions could enhance the credibility of the testing process [27][29]. Group 3: Implications for the Industry - The testing results serve as a wake-up call for brands that emphasize autonomous driving features, as the overall performance was subpar across the board [24]. - The article suggests that for Dongche Di to transition from merely conducting tests to establishing standards, it must engage more with industry stakeholders and regulatory bodies [29].